Young activist and television host Thinzar Shun Lei Yi would once have called herself one of Burmese State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi’s greatest fans. Now, she is one of her most vocal critics.
The 27-year-old belongs to a small, but high-profile group of liberal activists, many former die-hard Aung San Suu Kyi supporters, who are growing increasingly disillusioned with the administration they voted into power with sky-high hopes three years ago.
“I lost my idol; I’m confused, frustrated and lost,” said Thinzar Shun Lei Yi, who hosts an Under 30 talk show on a popular local Web site.
Illustration: Mountain People
“Most of the activists and youths are now thinking: ‘What is next,’ ‘What will happen,’ ‘What can we do?’ At this stage, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is going her own way and nobody can intervene, and she won’t listen to civil society organizations,” she said, using the honorific for women in Myanmar.
While Aung San Suu Kyi continues to inspire devotion among many ordinary Burmese, the emergence of a dissenting youth movement — driven by anger over her handling of ethnic minorities, including the Muslim Rohingya, as well as curbs on the media and civil society — presents a new challenge for her administration.
At stake is the future of Myanmar’s transition toward democracy after years of military rule. With a general election looming in 2020, the nation’s first civilian government in decades is confronted with growing divisions among activists who once coalesced around her National League for Democracy (NLD) party.
NLD spokesman Myo Nyunt said the party was trying to win over young people, increasing the budget for education and supporting vocational training programs.
“The youth and the people expected a lot from our government,” he said. “We couldn’t live up to their expectations, we admit, but we are doing our best.”
Aung San Suu Kyi took power in 2016 after a landslide election win, vowing to continue democratic reforms and end the country’s long-running civil wars.
Since then, the administration has come under pressure over its response to a military crackdown against the Rohingya minority that the UN has described as “ethnic cleansing” with “genocidal intent,” as well as faltering peace talks with ethnic armed groups and a stagnating economy.
Activists say the civilian government has also become increasingly authoritarian, failing to use its overwhelming legislative majority to scrap colonial-era laws used to stifle dissent, while tightening restrictions on civil society.
In recent months, they have staged several protests, including an anti-war march in Yangon in May that ended in scuffles. A total of 17 people were charged with unlawful protest, including Thinzar Shun Lei Yi. Their trial is ongoing.
“Sensitive issues are banned, and protesters arrested and beaten,” she said. “The National League of Democracy, the party using the name of democracy, must respect democracy and human rights.”
According to free speech organization Athan, which means “voice” in Burmese, 44 journalists and 142 activists have faced trial since the Aung San Suu Kyi government took power.
They include Reuters reporters Wa Lone, 32, and Kyaw Soe Oo, 28, who in September were sentenced to seven years in prison after being convicted of breaking the colonial-era Official Secrets Act.
The journalists are appealing their conviction to the High Court, citing evidence of a police set-up and lack of proof of a crime.
Aung San Suu Kyi in September said that their jailing had nothing to do with freedom of expression. The government says Myanmar’s court’s are independent.
Athan founder, poet and activist Maung Saung Kha, was among the protesters charged alongside Thinzar Shun Lei Yi in May. Four months later, in September, they both helped organize another demonstration, this time for free speech.
Facing the crowd, Maung Saung Kha — who is still an NLD member — donned the orange shirt traditionally worn by his party’s lawmakers and draped a green jacket resembling military garb over it. Armed with a copy of the state-run daily newspaper the Mirror, he began beating journalists gathered nearby.
“The government has failed to use its power to protect people’s rights,” he told reporters.
Myo Nyunt said the government was cooperating with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), but their activities needed to be examined case-by-case.
“If it is not related to security or not a divisive issue among ethnics, we accept them,” he said. “We are going forward to democracy, so we acknowledge the role of NGOs, but we have concerns that NGOs are being influenced by sponsors instead of being independent.”
While she has no control over the military, Aung San Suu Kyi has faced international criticism for failing to defend the Rohingya, more than 730,000 of whom fled a sweeping army cracking in western Rakhine State last year, according to UN agencies. The crackdown was launched in response to insurgent Rohingya attacks on security forces.
Myanmar denies almost all the allegations of atrocities, saying that the army was carrying out a legitimate campaign against terrorists.
While many among Myanmar’s Buddhist majority revile the Rohingya, the young activists offer a rare sympathetic voice.
“We acknowledge Rohingya. We totally denounce the fact that they are referred to as ‘Bengali,’” said Maung Saung Kha, referring to a term commonly used in Myanmar to imply that the Rohingya are interlopers from Bangladesh, despite a long history in the country.
“We haven’t seen any acknowledgment or punishment for the things that happened,” he said. “The refugees will not come back as long as these people think of them as less than humans and that it is not a crime to kill them.”
Khin Sandar, another activist facing unlawful protest charges, spent months campaigning for the NLD ahead of the 2015 election, but lost faith in Aung San Suu Kyi over her handling of the Rakhine crisis.
Her family was affected in a wave of communal violence in 2012, when not only Rohingya, but members of the Kaman Muslim minority — who also face discrimination, but unlike the Rohingya are considered citizens — were driven from their homes. They live in crowded internal displacement camps outside the Rakhine State capital, Sittwe, and are subjected to severe restrictions on movement.
In a speech after last year’s violence, Aung San Suu Kyi said that all residents of Rakhine “have access to education and healthcare services without discrimination.”
“My own nephew and nieces are still living in the Sittwe camps and they don’t have those rights,” Khin Sandar said. “I was shocked. How can she say that in her speech?”
Afterward, she quit her job as researcher for an NLD lawmaker, she said.
While the young activists represent only a small segment of Burmese society, they are increasingly influential in the grassroots activism scene, while their protests and public comments have attracted significant attention from media and from their vast social media followings.
Mostly in their 20s and 30s, they highlight the gulf between Myanmar’s young population — the median age is 27 — and its aging leadership, comprised of mostly men in their 60s and 70s.
“Myanmar is a very conservative country, these young people especially from Yangon are now challenging that,” said Myat Thu, a political analyst at Yangon School of Political Science. “In order to have a revolution of ideas, not many people need to know. They will spread it gradually.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with