Professing its solicitude for the wishes of Taiwan’s voters, the Chinese Communist Party could hardly restrain its joy at the results of the Nov. 24 elections. Its nemesis, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and her Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) fared badly, casting a pall on their prospects for the 2020 election.
Two other outcomes give Beijing even more reason to celebrate. Each presents it with opportunities and, arguably, obligations going forward.
First was the failure of the referendum to change the name of Taiwan’s Olympic team from “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan.”
China strongly opposed the change and relishes the ongoing humiliation the current name imposes on Taiwan and its athletes by having them introduced not as a country, but as a mere subsidiary city of Greater China.
Several Chinese officials have ventured their expert electoral analysis on why the referendum lost and on the election results generally.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) put it in as understated a manner as he could: “We have noticed the results of the election.”
He went on to say that the referendum failed because its supporters “put the interests of Taiwan’s athletes at stake ... against the people’s will; the attempts at Taiwan independence are doomed to fail.”
While Chinese officials’ concern for the wishes of Taiwan’s voters is heartwarming, why stop there? Beijing has the opportunity — and, for the sake of fairness and logical consistency (two values Chinese communists cherish) the obligation — to drive the point home by wiping the offensive name “Taiwan” from its lexicon.
China should honor the voters’ choice by using the new name in all official communications as they expunge the offensive name of Taiwan. Ma could start with the title of his own organization, which should rightfully be called the Taipei City Affairs Office of the State Council.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) will want to show bold leadership by starting the transition right at the top and inaugurating the new Taipei City Office of the Central Committee of China. He will take every opportunity to remind the world that “the Taipei City question cannot be put off for another generation.”
The Shanghai Communique and all subsequent statements will surely emphasize that Beijing can never accept “two Chinas, or one China and one Taipei City,” nor will China tolerate international shipping using the Taipei City Strait without permission. All this should assure the Taipei City-ese that their votes are being honored by Beijing.
Speaking of respecting voters’ will, that brings us to the second, and even more important, development from the elections: China’s growing appreciation for the democratic process.
Taiwan policy experts are debating how much of a factor Beijing’s influence operations played. Some say the effect was marginal at best, while others argue it might have been pivotal in some areas, especially on the Olympic name change question.
However, even if China’s vigorous intervention or interference did not change a single vote, Beijing now seems all-in on democratic participation.
Considering that it only started dabbling in electoral politics over the past decade or so, it launched a relatively sophisticated information campaign to sway voters away from the referendum and DPP candidates.
It certainly did its best to affect the outcome and deserves much credit for trying to learn how voters think, what they want and what kinds of appeals could motivate them to decide.
This is an admirable step forward for China’s leaders, whose previous experience with exercise of the franchise was “democratic centralism,” whereby a few thousand stage-managed party members robotically wave their placards in unison to demonstrate their passionate unanimity with whatever their dear leader wants to do.
China is definitely getting the hang of the democracy thing, having honed its skills by consistently tampering with Hong Kong’s partial autonomy under the promise of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) “one country, two systems.”
Before too much longer, Beijing will have developed enough self-confidence in navigating the shoals of democratic politics that it will want to try it on a moderate scale in China itself.
All the years of hard practice in Hong Kong and Taiwan (and possibly even the US) will have been proved worthwhile and the world will rejoice that democracy has finally come to China.
As China’s leaders are convinced of their superior governing style, they will enjoy persuading Chinese to keep them in power. If not, they can always try again.
After all, as Zhang Wensheng (張文生), deputy head of the (Taipei City) Research Institute at Xiamen University, said of the election results: “Any party or politician would be dumped by voters if they ignore the interests of the public.”
The long-ignored citizens of China can hardly wait.
Joseph Bosco served as China country director in the office of the US secretary of defense and taught a graduate seminar on US-China-Taiwan relations at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. He is a fellow at the Institute for Taiwan-American Studies.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS