Just as the Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded for work in environmental economics, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) — which should champion green governance — approved the environmental impact assessment for the Datan Power Plant at Taoyuan’s Guantang Industrial Park, to the surprise of many.
Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), while on the presidential campaign trail, vowed that algal reefs in the area would be protected, while Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) expressed his concern for them.
However, now, the powers-that-be are allowing the destruction of this precious natural heritage. The Democratic Progressive Party has abandoned its environmentally friendly image and can kiss goodbye to the idea of a green homeland.
The reefs are one of Taoyuan’s most valuable ecological resources and might be accorded World Heritage status. Unlike coral reefs, which are made of the remains of coral polyps — algal reefs are made of plants through the calcification of crustose coralline algae and the gradual accumulation of layers of calcium carbonate.
The production of algal reefs proceeds at a slow rate, less than 1cm per decade. Their destruction should not be taken lightly. Algal reefs contain a wealth of natural resources, and provide habitats for marine species such as crabs, mullet, blowfish and sea anemones.
The coastal algal reef in Taoyuan’s Guanyin District (觀音) is the largest stretch of algal reefs in Taiwan. More than a decade ago, groups protested a CPC Corp, Taiwan project to dig up natural gas pipes in the area and in 2014 the Council of Agriculture placed the Guanxin Algal Reefs Ecosystem Wildlife Conservation Area under the protection of the Wildlife Conservation Act (野生動物保育法) to conserve this valuable wildlife habitat.
Meetings of the EPA’s environmental quality advisory committee require that academics and experts testify in person and that committee members who are government officials be present, not represented by proxies.
The vote on the Datan assessment passed with seven affirmative votes from government representatives; two from academics and experts were declared invalid and one was left blank; three attendees abstained; and there were eight no-shows. The vote was clearly pushed through by the government representatives and could hardly be regarded as a resounding endorsement.
The entire process has been flawed and controversial. The non-governmental committee members clearly did not support the assessment and the vote cannot lay claim to any legitimacy.
Given their unique nature, algal reefs should qualify as a “natural landscape” as defined by the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保存法).
The Council of Agriculture, in Article 8 of the Wildlife Conservation Act, specified the designation requirements to conserve wildlife habitats and ecologies and a public hearing should be called to decide whether this should include Guantang.
During its review, the EPA, faced with differing legal standpoints for three central government agencies, evaded a strategic environmental assessment, but it should complete one to defend its decision from criticism by environmental groups and the public.
Our children and grandchildren should not be denied the opportunity to see this valuable natural heritage, so committee members should reconsider their decision.
Ted Chiou is a professor in Yuan Ze University’s Department of Social and Policy Sciences.
Translated by Paul Cooper
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS