Fri, Sep 14, 2018 - Page 8 News List

Nuclear power industry not mature

By Gloria Hsu 徐光蓉

A few milestones for nuclear energy have been achieved recently. First, it was announced that the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is halfway to completion in 2025 to generate plasma fusion, “demonstrating the feasibility of fusion as a clean, safe and nearly limitless source of energy.”

Second, China’s Sanmen Nuclear Power Station, the first in the world to adopt Westinghouse Electric Co’s AP1000 pressurized water reactor, has been completed and is to enter commercial operations by the end of the year.

Third, construction of the first third-generation European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) has been completed in Finland. It is being tested and is expected to generate electricity by the end of next year.

Pro-nuclear advocates are not thrilled by these developments and they are painful to the nuclear power industry as their dreams meet with setback after setback.

The US, Japan, Russia and the EU collaborated in a nuclear fusion research project about 20 years ago, but there was still a long way to go after more than 10 years of research and constantly increasing budgets.

Two years after the US opted out in 1999 and the project came to a halt, a simplified conceptual model design came out, and China, South Korea and India joined the project.

However, the production of the first plasma fusion reactor, originally scheduled for this year, has been delayed to 2025, and the cost has doubled.

After plasma is produced, it might take another 10 years to achieve a genuine nuclear fusion reaction. Many people doubt whether the project would generate the 10-fold gain of plasma heating power needed for the reactor to operate. Furthermore, the ITER does not even aim to generate electricity.

It was also about 20 years ago when Westinghouse released the design of the AP1000, which greatly simplified the mechanisms of switch, motor, safety grid connection and control systems. The reactor can be built using existing factory products, which makes construction easier and cheaper than older models.

Construction of the first AP1000 at the Sanmen power plant began in 2008, but the launch date has been postponed from 2014 to this year and costs have increased by at least US$1.5 billion.

In 2008, Georgia Power Co and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co in the US each signed a contract with Westinghouse for two AP1000 reactors.

Even though the AP1000 is the most economical nuclear power reactor, the operators asked consumers to help pay for the cost when the four reactors began construction.

Since both sites started pouring basemat concrete in March 2013, they have consistenly fallen behind schedule while costs have kept on mounting.

Soon after Westinghouse filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March last year, construction of the two reactors in South Carolina was stopped and many are pessimistic about the completion of the two reactors in Georgia.

The EPR model, designed and developed by German and French companies, was released in 2007. The European model promises high efficiency, multilayered disaster prevention security, factory-made components and a reasonable price.

Construction commenced in Finland in August 2005 and operations were to begin in May 2009. The French contractor, Areva, was confident and promised that it would absorb any costs above the 3.7 billion euro (US$4.3 billion at the current exchange rate) contract.

This story has been viewed 1906 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top