China’s ethnic nationalism
Taiwan’s belligerent and powerful enemy across the Taiwan Strait bases part of its sovereignty claim over Taiwan on an ethnic nationalist fallacy — that Taiwan is part of China because Taiwanese are part of the Chinese race (中華民族).
This claim is ridiculous, because, while China incessantly boasts about its 5,000 years of history, Aborigines lived in Taiwan for millennia before civilization across the Strait even began. Aborigines were the sole inhabitants for at least 7,000 years before anyone from Fujian Province even set foot in Taiwan.
To claim that Aborigines are Chinese necessitates that their descendants — who populated the Philippines, Hawaii, Madagascar, Polynesia and New Zealand — are also Chinese.
Citizenship in modern democracies is not based on ethnicity and can be obtained through birth, naturalization, ancestry or marriage.
As a one-party state and fledgling dictatorship, China has only one true citizen with meaningful participation in the political process: [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平).
The remaining population are Chinese nationals, but not citizens; and even this dubious honor can only be bestowed by birth or ethnicity.
It is through the naturalization of new citizens that Taiwan has the opportunity to skin two cats with one knife.
Years of record-low birthrates have left Taiwan facing a demographic crisis and increased immigration could not only defuse this ticking gray bomb, but could show the international community of democratic nations that being Taiwanese does not require one to be ethnically Chinese. Like the most Taiwanese of all — Aborigines.
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his