Return treasures to China
In his Taipei Times op-ed Chen Mao-Hsiung (陳茂雄) states that “legally and from the Taiwanese public’s subjective self-awareness, Taiwan is not a part of China” (“Taiwanese unwilling to identify as Chinese,” July 5, page 8).
Chen carefully argues for the truth of his assertion, finally stating that “Taiwanese and Chinese belong to two different worlds, and the majority of Taiwanese are unwilling to be Chinese. As for the few people who identify with China, they should be allowed to return to their motherland.”
Given Chen’s thoughtfully reasoned argument, it is important now for Taiwan to act courageously and substantively assert its independence from China, politically (“legally”), socially and culturally (“subjectively”).
However, such a move would be fraught with uncertainty over Beijing’s reaction.
The last thing anyone wants on either side of the Strait is for a shift to a state of war. Thus, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) must choose her options carefully, making sure the steps she takes not only pragmatically assert the truth of Chen’s argument, but also substantively express a peaceful, generous and open-handed resolution.
Therefore, the best way for Tsai to start the process would be for her to initiate a kind of sacrifice that lives up to Chen’s claim that “Taiwanese and Chinese belong to two different worlds.”
The best course of action then is for the president to encourage Taiwanese to return to Beijing the entire collection of Chinese artifacts in the National Palace Museum.
This would do what Chen implies should be done with those things that identify Taiwan with China: send them back to the motherland.
It would also show that Taiwanese and Chinese belong to two different worlds, that China does not own Taiwan and Taiwan does not own China.
Beijing should appreciate having all those artifacts back in the country from which they were stolen by a previous generation, albeit one that acted out of the best intentions to preserve them, which is why Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) brought all those treasures from China to Taiwan in the first place.
Now that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has succeeded in its costly preservation efforts, giving the treasures back to their rightful owners would demonstrate both a tremendous act of good faith and respect for the Chinese people, while reminding them of the culture that their government at one time sought to destroy.
At the same time, it would honor the legacy of the Republic of China (ROC) for having rendered this great service to the posterity of China.
Finally, the time has passed for Taiwan to become a country — New Taiwan is a better idea. Let China have the old Taiwan that was two-faced about its heritage and so-called historical connection to China.
New Taiwan would be an intercultural beacon with the old National Palace Museum serving as an international conservatory of the arts, illuminating the principles of democracy and human rights for which all good people stand.
Xue Meng-ren
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with