The EU has pushed back a deadline for companies to volunteer to increase their use of recycled plastics in lieu of regulation, showing how difficult it is to end the continent’s reliance on developing countries dealing with its waste.
The pledges were due to have been made by the end of last month under a European plastics strategy unveiled in January, when China stopped taking the world’s waste due to pollution concerns, focusing minds on its environmental impact.
An EU official said that the deadline has been shifted to September after industry appealed for more time. That timeline makes the fallback option of legislation highly unlikely.
Illustration: Yusha
The EU recycles only a quarter of the 25 million to 26 million tonnes of plastics waste it produces per year and about half of that was sent to China, which uses recycled plastics to make products ranging from office furniture to cable coatings.
The European Council, the EU executive, wants 10 million tonnes of recycled plastics to be used in new products sold in the bloc by 2025 — quadrupling demand.
If company pledges do not tally up to that target, it has said that it would consider further measures, including regulatory action after December.
However, few new laws will be put forth next year because of elections for the European Parliament and European Commission presidecy — not to mention Britain’s scheduled exit from the bloc.
The European Council’s focus is on pushing through its proposal to ban throwaway plastics, such as cotton buds and plastic straws, and new labeling rules for plastic waste.
Without a mix of incentives and regulation to spur demand for the waste, industry sources said that there would be no sea change in the market.
Recyclers in Europe said that they are planning to scale up capacity, but to make it worthwhile, there need to be more buyers for recycled plastic closer to home.
In the meantime, they have found markets in other parts of Asia for just more than half the waste that used to go to China and said that much of the rest is being incinerated, raising the risk of backsliding in sorting efforts, which vary widely across the EU.
“If China no longer imports plastic waste, we cannot tell Europeans to stop sorting because we have no more buyers,” Suez SA chief financial officer and head of recycling Jean-Marc Boursier said. “The right answer is for authorities to change the paradigm and boost the incorporation of secondary materials.”
Divisions within the 28-member bloc and warnings from companies that incorporating recycled plastic would lower the quality of products and increase costs mean that enforcing the target is difficult.
Some companies have come forward.
Among the more ambitious, Volvo, owned by China’s Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co Ltd, has said that a quarter of plastics used in its models would be from recycled materials by 2025, while Danone said that its Evian plastic bottles would be made from 100 percent recycled plastic by then.
Austrian plastics maker Borealis, which makes plastics used in products from food packaging to cars, also said that it would invest more in coming years to produce “completely waste-based” recycled goods.
Companies from all along the plastics value chain have shown interest in the pledging campaign, the commission official said.
“We think it is possible to achieve this target on a voluntary basis,” they said.
However, other EU sources said that the political push hung on industry goodwill and it would be difficult to even assess whether promises amounted to enough to shift demand.
It is an uphill battle to make recycling profitable, Borealis CEO Alfred Stern said.
“Technologies need to be developed,” he said. “But the end goal needs to be commercial, economic viability.”
Suez and fellow French water and waste group Veolia, Europe’s biggest recycling companies, both see an eventual upside to China’s restrictions, with plastics waste a relatively small, but growing part of their business.
“The impact of the ban on Europe’s recycling industry is enormous and while it is a disturbance in the short term, over the long term it is a good business opportunity,” Veolia head of plastics strategy Woldemar d’Ambrieres said.
Unlike glass, which is cheaper to produce from recycled glass than from silicate, plastics are hard to sort and recycle economically in Europe, especially when oil prices are low.
Suez processes about 400,000 tonnes of plastic waste and produces 150,000 tonnes of recycled plastic per year. It wants to recycle all the waste it sorts and, if market prices hold up, is to invest about 100 million euros (US$116.4 million) over the next three years to boost its recycling capacity to 600,000 tonnes per year.
“We want industry to make water bottles from water bottles, milk bottles from milk bottles, shampoo bottles from shampoo bottles,” Boursier said.
Veolia recycles about 300,000 tonnes of plastics per year and aims to boost plastics recycling revenue to 1 billion euros per year by 2025, from 200 million euros today.
Many of the smaller companies that handle much of the continent’s plastic waste also have plans to invest and some plastics producers are teaming up with recyclers, industry body Plastics Recyclers Europe (PRE) said.
In November, Suez and major plastics manufacturer LyondellBasell together bought Dutch plastics recycler QCP, while Borealis bought two German plastics recyclers in 2016.
“The plastics industry did not do enough to close the loop,” PRE director Antonino Furfari said. “It realizes now that the way to do that is to invest in recyclers.”
Additional reporting by Alister Doyle and Ludwig Burger
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with