“Timeliness and favorable circumstances” might be how most Taiwanese feel about Taiwan-US relations, but that might be naive and wishful thinking.
Admittedly, high-ranking officials, such as national security adviser John Bolton, have expressed Taiwan-friendly views before assuming office, some even proposing that the US officially recognize Taiwan’s status as a country. It is difficult to say if they will fulfill their past commitments, but their friendly stance is unlikely to change.
The Taiwanese public of course hopes that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will take advantage of the amicable atmosphere and contact high-ranking US officials to work on Taiwan’s international status together.
The distance between the government and the public is greatest in the field of foreign affairs, as it is generally thought of as secretive and hidden from the public. Ordinary people have very few channels to make their opinions on the topic heard, except through legislators making inquiries at question-and-answer sessions at the legislature.
The workings of foreign policy are perhaps beyond the general public, but the ministry’s attitude is not hard to grasp: It is grounded in the aspiration of “maintaining the ‘status quo’” and a fear of upsetting China.
Everyone knows that Taiwan’s security depends on the US and Japan’s support and defensive assistance, but the government is afraid of becoming too close to the them — especially militarily, to avoid provoking China.
The necessity of such “fear” should be closely scrutinized. Chinese officials, regardless of rank, are allowed to promote unification when visiting Taiwan, yet their Taiwanese counterparts dare not say a thing about “freedom, democracy and human rights” in China.
After describing himself as “a pragmatic political worker for Taiwanese independence,” Premier William Lai (賴清德) was accused of “being irresponsible,” but most Taiwanese were touched by his courage and respected his honesty.
Government and media outlets once dared not call China “China,” referring to it as “the mainland” instead, and were afraid of referring to Taiwan as “Taiwan.” It was not until China made a series of aggressive moves that they suddenly woke up and started talking about “China” and “Taiwan.” This will hopefully continue to be the case.
Staff in US President Donald Trump’s administration frequently changes and it is far from certain how much longer Taiwan-friendly officials will remain in their positions. Most Taiwanese feel that the government should take advantage of the current situation.
First, the government should encourage contact between high-ranking officials from the two nations and discuss how to improve Taiwan’s international status, especially in terms of its participation in non-governmental specialized organizations such as the WHO or the International Civil Aviation Organization.
Second, the government should promote military ties with Washington and discuss stationing US troops here. US troops have frequently visited Taiwan over the past 150 years and have even been stationed here, so they are no strangers to the nation.
Third, as Chinese military aircraft and warships frequently encircle Taiwan as a form of psychological warfare, the Tsai administration should invite the US Seventh Fleet to conduct routine patrols and surveillance in nearby waters to alleviate public anxiety.
The US Navy and Air Force should frequently visit the Taiwan Strait as a reminder that its waters and airspace are international. Otherwise, China could turn the Strait into its own territory.
Peng Ming-min was an adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with