“Two Koreas, with free interpretations” — the Panmunjom summit between South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on Friday last week gave the impression that the two leaders are big-hearted because they treated each other respectfully and interacted freely.
The language of the Panmunjom Declaration might be intricate, but it was written based on free will. What it talks about is peaceful coexistence rather than “one Korea” and “unification,” or which side is going to swallow the other.
It is amazing to witness this turn of history. What a change there has been since 1950, when Kim’s grandfather, Kim Il-sung, sent his troops south to unify Korea. Now we see Kim Jong-un, with atom bombs and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in his pocket, embracing Moon and talking about denuclearization and working together to promote peace.
North Korea’s “rise” under Kim Jong-un has followed a different script from that of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), but with similar ends in mind.
In the early 1960s, then-Chinese minister of foreign affairs Chen Yi (陳毅), said that Chinese needed to get an atom bomb, even if they had to pawn their pants to get it.
Similarly, and with no regard for the lives of ordinary North Koreans, Kim Jong-un has done his utmost to get nuclear weapons and ICBMs in a bid to win the US’ respect and get it to engage in talks.
Kim Jong-un might be ruthless when it comes to palace power struggles, but having gone to school in Switzerland, his ideas about the nation and its territory are not as feudalistic and rigid as Mao’s were. He does not demand that South Korea accept the idea of “one Korea” and unification on his terms just because he is the one with nuclear weapons.
With respect to nationhood and international standing, the two Koreas are better off than Taiwan.
In 1936, Mao told US journalist Edgar Snow that the Chinese Communist Party would support independence for Japan’s colonies Korea and Taiwan after Japan was ousted from China.
Eventually the war did come to an end, and Korea did not just become independent — it became two independent countries supported by the US and the Soviet Union respectively. Taiwan, in contrast, was taken over and placed under martial law by Chinese Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) after he occupied it on behalf of the Allied powers.
The 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan, known as the San Francisco Peace Treaty, clearly states what should happen to Korea, and also to Taiwan and Penghu, then known as Formosa and the Pescadores.
The treaty text says: “Japan, recognizing the independence of Korea, renounces all right, title and claim to Korea, including the islands of Quelpart, Port Hamilton and Dagelet [Jeju, Komundo and Ulleungdo].”
Japan did not recognize the independence of Taiwan, but as with Korea, the treaty says that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.”
The only thing missing is that the treaty did not determine to whom this “right, title and claim” should be conceded.
Although the San Francisco Treaty does not recognize Taiwan’s independent status, its wording makes it clear that Taiwan does not belong to China.
Every country should respect Taiwanese’s right to self-determination and their right to establish an independent nation.
By disregarding the terms of the treaty and making military and verbal threats to annex Taiwan, China has proven itself to be more of a rogue than Kim Jong-un.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a