For years, Valdomiro Facchi has made a living ranching on land carved from the Amazon rainforest. He is a small player in one of the world’s biggest environmental disasters.
However, now that his cattle have trampled the pastures to dust — and new laws prevent him from clearing fresh land — he has to find new income.
“I want to diversify,” the 68-year old rancher said, outlining plans to plant cocoa trees on his 300-hectare plot in Brazil’s Para State. “I want to have the cocoa income when profit from cattle ranching fails.”
Illustration: Lance Liu
Facchi illustrates a trend that is turning damaged parts of the Amazon basin green again, and creating an usual alliance between the agriculture industry and conservationists. Brazil’s cattle ranchers are planting cocoa on their used-up pasture, with financial support from international environmental groups.
That is a big change. For decades, ranchers have been the engine of clear-cutting in the Amazon rainforest that has rendered an area nearly the size of Spain treeless. Environmentalists have said the practice destroys wildlife habitat and undermines the planet’s ability to absorb carbon dioxide that causes global warming.
“Besides being a means of avoiding deforestation, cocoa plantations favor the local, regional and national economy,” international environmental group The Nature Conservancy said on its Web site.
The young trees will also bring change to global cocoa markets. Brazil’s National Association of the Cocoa Processing Industry (AIPC) expects the surge in planting to help double the nation’s output of the raw material in chocolate by 2028 to 400,000 tonnes a year. That increase would raise global output by about 5 percent.
The renewed planting could make Brazil one of the world’s top three cocoa growers again after the sector was decimated in the 1990s by a crop fungus called witches’ broom.
Conservationists and cocoa industry representatives expect the trend to help mitigate the effects of clear-cutting that has ripped about 430,000km2 from the Amazon rain forest since the 1980s.
Fifty percent of cocoa production growth will come from the Amazon, AIPC executive director Eduardo Bastos said, calling the cocoa farms there “chocolate forests.”
Green groups like The Nature Conservancy and the Amazon Fund have helped finance new cocoa plantations. The Amazon Fund — which was set up by the Brazilian government and takes international donations to combat deforestation — has poured 17 million reais (US$5.09 million) in grants into the crop.
Nearly 1,700km2 of degraded cattle pasture in Brazil has already been transformed into cocoa plantations, Bastos said.
Cocoa planting is driven mainly by new limits on the cattle industry that have changed the financial incentives for ranchers. In the Amazon, pasture can become degraded in as little as three years if not managed properly, making it hard to raise a thriving herd without new acreage.
Brazil in 2014 passed a law that allows landowners to clear only 20 percent of their property in the Amazon and requires some landowners to replant depleted areas.
That law aims to curb deforestation, which peaked in 2004 at a pace of 27,000km2 per year. Last year, the Brazilian Amazon lost 6,624km2 of rainforest.
Compared to ranching, cocoa can provide income from a relatively small plot with no need for constant expansion. The profits can be up to five times better, said Eduardo Trevisan Goncalves, project manager at Brazil’s Imaflora, an environmental group that did a study comparing income from cattle and cocoa in the region.
The benefits extend to the environment. Cocoa plantations can imitate natural forests, helping to restore native plant and wildlife species, boosting water resources and absorbing carbon dioxide, Goncalves said.
“It is a perennial crop,” he said. “It will stay there for decades.”
Funding from environmental groups comes with guidelines intended to boost the ecological benefits of the plantations, said Jose Garcia, a farmer in central Para who is receiving a grant from the Amazon Fund.
Under the terms, he will have to plant cocoa alongside other taller native species, such as mahogany and ipe, he said.
“It is recommended that cocoa be planted with other trees — taller ones — to benefit from the shade,” he said at his farm in Medicilandia.
Evidence of the shift is everywhere in the Medicilandia region, where barren pastures have given way to shady plantations of cocoa trees bearing yellow and ruby pods, the fibrous protective coverings for the cocoa beans.
In the city of Medicilandia, a low-lying town lined with dirt roads, farmers truck bags full of dried cocoa beans to warehouses bearing signs that read “we buy cocoa.”
Shops nearby offer ice-cold cocoa juice, a thick, sweet drink prepared with the fruit’s pulp.
Brazil is an agricultural heavyweight, among the world’s top growers of soybeans, corn, sugar, coffee and oranges, but it dropped from being No. 2 in cocoa in the early 1990s after witches’ broom slashed its production.
However, in Para, witches’ broom rarely survives long enough to damage trees. The fungus requires moist conditions and largely dies off during the annual dry season.
As a result, cocoa tree yields in Para are nearly double the global average, Bastos said.
There is some evidence Brazil could absorb some of this extra production: Euromonitor International pegs per capita chocolate consumption in Brazil at just 1.2 kilograms a year, compared with 8.8 kg in Switzerland, suggesting Brazil’s domestic chocolate market has room to grow.
Brazil’s processing companies — which transform cocoa beans into butter, powder and chocolate — welcome the prospect of increased domestic supply to feed their factories and lower their imports, but inject a note of skepticism.
For example, Olam International’s cocoa vice president in Brazil, Kidambi Srinivasan, called the 400,000 tonne per year target “an unlikely possibility” without higher market prices and more assistance to planters, including financing, training and supplies.
Benchmark cocoa prices in New York are currently running at about US$2,500 a tonne, having bounced off a 10-year low of US$1,756 hit last year on worries of global oversupply.
Other big processors in Brazil include Cargill, which has an 85,000 tonne per year plant in Ilheus, and Barry Callebaut, the world’s biggest maker of industrial chocolate, which opened its first South American chocolate facility in Brazil in 2010.
For some of the ranchers-turned-planters, the chance to undo some of the damage to the Amazon caused by ranching is as important as the money they can earn from cocoa.
“There was a time when I thought: We shouldn’t have come here,” said Elido Trevisan, who arrived in Para to ranch in 1972 and cleared nearly 100 percent of his land.
“But now, we can do something to compensate,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with