Despite attempts by the Chinese ambassador to the US to exert pressure on US senators not to approve the Taiwan Travel Act, the US Senate followed the US House of Representatives by unanimously passing the bill.
Decisionmakers in Beijing might have been misled by Taiwanese academics and sections of the media which support China into believing that a Taiwan-friendly bill would not pass the US Congress. Beijing might also be placing its hopes on US President Donald Trump doing it a favor, since the bill still requires his signature before it can become law.
However, this is wishful thinking on Beijing’s part and China’s leadership is setting itself up for a big disappointment.
The Trump administration’s national security team has issued numerous criticisms of former US presidents Barack Obama’s, George W. Bush’s and Bill Clinton’s China policies, which they view as having been too eager to indulge Beijing.
They have also made it clear that this administration would not continue such policies, but instead bring new ideas to the table which would incorporate Trump’s “America First” principles.
The most obvious example of this is when on Dec. 18 last year Trump announced a National Security Strategy aimed squarely at China. The report defined China as the US’ main security threat and an enemy, which through “economic incursion,” and expanding power and influence is challenging the US’ traditional leadership role, not just in the Asia-Pacific region, but globally, in a bid to supplant the US as the world’s pre-eminent power.
The report also emphasized US security guarantees to Taiwan.
Washington is taking immediate action by implementing an Asia-Pacific strategy aimed at forming an alliance of nations to contain China in a modern day version of the vertical alliance strategy of China’s Warring States period.
Under the strategy, the US, Japan, India and Australia would join forces to surround and contain the rising power and dominance of China. This means that Taiwan would, once again, become a valued strategic partner of the US.
The Trump administration has already initiated its so-called Section 301 investigation, which is looking into imposing heavy tariffs on Chinese imports such as photovoltaic modules and industrial washing machines. The investigation is also exploring introducing more stringent criteria and a stricter review processes for acquisitions of US businesses by Chinese companies, but it might risk setting off a global trade war.
Trump has reason to be dissatisfied with Beijing. During several face-to-face meetings and telephone calls with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Trump has pressed Xi to support international efforts to reign in Pyongyang’s nuclear ambitions and eliminate the US’ trade deficit.
Xi’s commitment to dealing with these issues has always been half-hearted. He simply paid lip service to Trump’s requests to string him along.
Trump has now run out of patience and decided to overturn the US-China relationship.
Xi now realizes he completely misjudged the situation and is scrambling to put out the flames. At the beginning of last month, Xi dispatched Chinese State Counselor Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) to Washington for bilateral talks to negotiate with his counterpart, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
Yang was to raise an official objection to the US-Taiwan relationship and register China’s disapproval in the hope of achieving concessions; Beijing’s emissary returned home empty-handed.
Xi and Wang Qishan (王岐山) — a close ally of Xi’s who is to become Chinese vice president — have both met with US Ambassador to China Terry Branstad, a close ally of Trump, hoping to reverse US hostility toward China.
Xi has also sent Chinese Communist Party member and soon-to-be vice-premier Liu He (劉鶴) to Washington to try to save the US-China relationship and alleviate the threat of a US-China trade war.
Beijing has issued 31 “measures to benefit the people” in an attempt to lure Taiwanese to China, which is motivated by the abject failure of China’s policy of “unification by force,” which has caused resentment among Taiwanese and sparked a backlash from Washington.
In response, the US Congress has passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 and the Taiwan Travel Act, which are designed to upgrade US-Taiwan defense cooperation and the US-Taiwan diplomatic relationship, and counter the Chinese military threat.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in has displayed considerable political agility in facilitating North Korea’s participation in last month’s Pyeongchang Winter Olympics and is pushing for deeper reconciliation with the North. In doing so, Moon has completely excluded Beijing from its traditional role as a go-between.
The international community originally believed Beijing possessed significant influence over Pyongyang, but China has been marginalized. It is another setback for the diplomacy of a nation that aspires to be a great power.
Parris Chang is a former deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with