Turkey began targeting northern Syria with airstrikes and heavy shelling in a campaign that it claims is designed to neutralize a security threat on its southern border. The area under attack, and Afrin, the city from which I fight, is controlled by the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG).
As a commander in the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which includes the YPG, let me be unequivocal: There is no truth to Turkey’s claims that we are waging war across the border. In fact, the opposite is true; with Operation Olive Branch, Turkey is attacking us. And yet, for reasons that I cannot comprehend, it is doing so with tacit approval from the international community.
Our forces do not sponsor attacks against the Turkish state. (The YPG has only returned fire against Turkish positions that have shelled us.) Our only war is with militants from the Islamic State (IS), a fight the US has supported us in waging. But now, with the fight against IS largely over, our international backers have grown quieter — just as Turkey’s rockets have gotten louder.
Illustration: June Hsu
Ever since the Syrian conflict began in 2011, Turkey has aligned itself with the wrong side. It cooperated closely with the Salafist Ahrar al-Sham rebel group, whose leaders were al-Qaeda members in Afghanistan. Turkey also lent support to militants from al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (formerly al-Nusra Front).
Until recently, Turkish leaders turned a blind eye to the foreign fighters transiting through their country to join IS in Syria. In October 2014, then-US vice president Joseph Biden told a public audience that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had privately admitted that Turkey had “let too many people through.” Although Biden later apologized for the revelation, it reaffirmed that Turkey has repeatedly mishandled its approach to the conflict.
The SDF, on the other hand, has supported the region’s democratic aspirations by fighting for a Middle East free of militants. For more than a year before IS became a household name in the US and Europe, our fighters were dying to keep the group at bay. We defended communities and minorities from the militants’ wrath, and prevented them from enslaving more women and stoning more dissidents than they did. By removing IS from the Turkish border, we thwarted the group’s efforts to extend its reach deeper into Europe.
Our campaign against IS in Kobani in 2015 led the US to increase its delivery of weapons, training, and air support. Through this partnership, the SDF brought IS to the brink of collapse.
However, these battles also came at a steep cost to my soldiers, who bore the brunt of the militants’ ferocity; IS killed thousands of our fighters, while the US military, which suffered some 4,500 casualties during the Iraq War, has lost only four soldiers in Syria.
Now that the fight against IS is winding down, the US seems less eager to support us, which has allowed Turkey to fire missiles and artillery at us with impunity. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, at least 70 civilians — and 21 children — have been killed during the operation, while more than 100 SDF soldiers have perished, including one female soldier whose body was mutilated by Turkish forces. At the moment, we are exposed to the full wrath of a NATO army, without access to even a single helicopter to evacuate our wounded.
Turkey’s leaders claim that they are fighting the SDF because we are “terrorists.” I challenge them to present evidence to support these claims. In reality, our biggest threat to Turkey is not our weapons, but our ideas and political organization. Erdogan fears our democratic values — we have brought freedom to regions ruled by brutal dictatorship for most of five decades. As Erdogan gives free rein to his autocratic tendencies, he worries that a true democracy on Turkey’s southern border could threaten his own grip on power.
For Erdogan, the best scenario for Syria would be a makeover as a Sunni Arab state, where Kurds and other minorities are sidelined. However, this would be to the detriment of Syria’s great diversity. By contrast, we support Syria’s ethnic and religious mosaic, and envision a future of coexistence among Christians, Circassians, and Yazidis — all groups that Turkey has shunned.
Erdogan has claimed that he wants “to deliver Afrin to its real owners,” thereby enabling the more than 3.5 million Syrian refugees in Turkey to return “to their own land as soon as possible.”
Yet, to many of us, Erdogan’s true objective in Afrin is to make the region Kurdenrein, turning us into a minority in our own home. Where are we expected to go? Kurds are not squatters in Afrin.
As Erdogan becomes increasingly erratic and alienates his Western allies, it is the Kurds who are suffering the most. We are willing to be good neighbors and work toward a negotiated settlement, but as long as Turkey continues to target us, drawing no meaningful condemnation for the assault, we will have no choice but to defend ourselves.
Mahmoud Berkhdan is a member of the general command of the Syrian Democratic Forces, based in Afrin, Syria.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with