The GDP data released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week highlight a dilemma facing the nation: Strong growth in external trade with below-target domestic demand.
It was a reminder of the central bank’s warning on Nov. 21 last year that soft domestic demand could explain Taiwan’s underperformance in recent years, compared with its regional peers.
According to the DGBAS estimates, the economy ended last year on a robust note, with GDP in the fourth quarter growing a faster than expected 3.28 percent year-on-year, the highest pace of expansion since the first quarter of 2015.
The data also suggested the economy is on course for a modest, but solid recovery — in seasonally adjusted terms — as it expanded 1.03 percent quarterly and 4.17 percent annually.
A breakdown of the data showed that steadily improving private consumption had been accompanied by still strong net external demand — ie, exports minus imports — which contributed 3 percentage points to GDP growth in the fourth quarter.
This took annual economic growth for all of last year to 2.84 percent, not only the strongest pace in three years, but one that exceeded predictions by the DGBAS and other institutes.
Even so, Taiwan remained one of the slowest-growing economies in Asia, compared with South Korea’s 3.1 percent growth, Singapore’s 3.5 percent and China’s 6.9 percent, to name just a few.
It is worth noting why the recovery in external trade did not significantly boost domestic demand: While private consumption contributed 1.47 percentage points to GDP growth, its strength was overshadowed by weakness in government spending and gross capital formation.
Government spending contracted 1.25 percent year-on-year and chipped 0.18 percentage points off the nation’s economic growth, while capital formation fell 4.78 percent annually and eroded 1 percentage point of the GDP growth, the DGBAS data showed. That means overall domestic demand increased just 0.33 percent from a year earlier and contributed just 0.29 percentage points to the economic growth in the quarter.
This raises the question if business confidence has continued to falter in anticipation of the local elections at the end of this year, despite government stimulus measures, and whether wage growth, low unemployment and a stellar stock market performance can be sustained to overcome challenges resulting from an aging population: a shrinking labor pool and higher welfare spending.
Should domestic demand be expected to pick up strongly this year? DGBAS officials last week confidently said that the situation would show a marked improvemen, as there are signs of more investment by semiconductor firms, coupled with an increase in infrastructure spending by the government.
However, it is unclear if the ongoing cyclical rebound in the economy will be able to last much longer, given that the boost to global demand from quantitative easing policies by major central banks is set to fade before long.
The central bank has said the nation’s soft domestic demand is due to the stagnant wage growth, an aging population, slow progress in industrial transformation and a lackluster track record in attracting private investment. It also blamed the slow progress in industrial transformation on local industries’ excessive reliance on manufacturing and the nation’s weak investment in innovation and fundamental research compared with other countries.
There is no doubt that Taiwan benefited immensely last year from the cyclical recovery in the global economy, but the government must address the domestic gloom and export boom if the situation is to continue this year and if the global economy suddenly makes a U-turn.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with