All governments are waging public relations campaigns to win popular opinion at home and abroad, as are many transnational corporations. This is particularly true of Taiwan, China, India, Japan and South Korea in this increasingly polarized world.
In this age when money talks louder than ever before, China has more channels and resources than other countries to provide a steady flow of information about its objectives and policies. It also appears to be well-placed to win friends and reshape global opinion over the Taiwan question.
Faced with this imbalance of power, Taiwan should pursue better and smarter official public relations to offer accurate information to foreign observers who might be disposed to take a more sympathetic view of the nation.
In particular, Taiwan’s democratization, its embrace of universal values and inclusive politics, and its gradual implementation of transitional justice should attract much international interest. The challenge is how to share the Taiwan story across formal and informal platforms.
A preliminary review of scholarship about Taiwan conducted by specialists in US and European universities reveals a discrepancy between insightful academic findings and their dissemination to the general public. There seems to be a stronger emphasis on Taiwanese history and culture than on its latest democratic accomplishments and cutting-edge technologies.
Therefore, the nation should use innovative methods to better communicate the Taiwan story.
One effective way is to draw on the experiences of Japan, South Korea and China to integrate general knowledge of Taiwan into school and university curricula. The goal is to make the Taiwan story a part of liberal arts education, not a special area of knowledge pursued by privileged elites in Ivy League schools.
Another way to improve media coverage of Taiwan in major newspapers is to arouse public curiosity about the nation. Conventional reporting about Taiwan appears to be sporadic and is usually tucked away in generic coverage on China. There is less interest in Taiwan’s efforts to transform its democracy, protect the environment and preserve its heritage.
If Taiwan is eager to be more visible on the global news landscape, it must nurture future opinion makers and leaders. The nation should create a Taiwanese equivalent of a Fulbright scholarship for international scholarly and cultural exchange.
At a time when Taiwanese universities and vocational colleges are faced with low enrollment, they should not only reach out to Chinese-speaking students from Hong Kong, Macau, China and Southeast Asia, but also open their doors to middle-class and low-income students in the West.
The skills gained by international students participating in Taiwan’s advanced educational system would expand their horizons, giving them first-hand experience of the nation and an appreciation of how it differs from other Chinese polities.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his