The Ministry of National Defense is showing some common sense; it is time that others in Taiwan, especially colleagues in the media, do the same.
Minister of National Defense Feng Shih-kuan (馮世寬) on Thursday announced that the ministry would no longer issue the repetitive, knee-jerk statements it is forced to release every time Chinese military aircraft or ships pass near Taiwan during training missions to the western Pacific Ocean: the ones that say the ministry is closely monitoring the situation, and the required early warning systems and defense measures are in place and ready to be activated.
The increasing displays of China’s growing military are the subject of much attention in Taiwan, Japan and the US, but they are primarily aimed at the domestic audience in China.
Beijing’s bark at present outstrips its bite. These displays are more psychological warfare than a real show of strength.
A similar example of Beijing’s bully bluster and psychological operations was the outrageous assertion at the beginning of the month by a senior diplomat at the Chinese embassy in Washington that the day a US Navy vessel makes a port call in Kaohsiung is the day the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) unites Taiwan with China by military force.
That time the intended audience included the US Congress, which was mulling the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2018, which included an urging for US Navy port calls in Taiwan.
The warning had little effect on Capitol Hill as lawmakers subsequently passed the bill, which was signed into law by US President Donald Trump last week, although the warning did fill lots of column inches in newspapers, and minutes of airtime at radio and television stations around the world.
Media outlets in Taiwan routinely and eagerly take Beijing’s bait, and demand comments from the ministry, from the Presidential Office and from the Cabinet after each flyby, sail-past or Beijing news conference, only to receive the same platitudes time after time.
Or, even worse, they hype the PLA exercises and go to the same academics and pundits to extrapolate and theorize, while only rarely producing anything new, useful or even intelligent.
It is time to call a time-out on such shenanigans; we have all heard the ready-to-defend-Taiwan message too many times before.
China is a threat to Taiwan, but at this point the threat is diplomatic and economic rather than military. It is more likely to try to launch a diplomatic offensive to convince more of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, such as the Vatican, to switch their recognition from Taipei to Beijing, or to threaten Taiwanese democracy supporters active on the Web or hinder expansion of Taiwanese businesses in third-party countries than the PLA is to launch an assault or invasion on Taiwan.
On a related note, while the defense ministry is in a downplaying mode, it should also consider stopping its own annual psychological operations — the ones aimed at Taiwanese, not across the Taiwan Strait or people in Washington or anywhere else — ahead of the Lunar New Year holidays.
These include the news conferences and press junkets in the run-up to the holidays, when the president visits an outlying island to boost the morale of troops stationed there; the drills aimed at reassuring the public that the military is prepared to counter any threat from China; and the carefully orchestrated interviews with fighter pilots, navy frogmen and others who talk about how they are proud to be working over the holiday to protect the nation.
Of course many in the military will be working over the Lunar New Year holiday, just like police and firefighters, doctors and nurses, media professionals and others; such schedules go with the job.
It is about time that a more common-sense approach is applied to military pronouncements and activities, whether by Taiwan’s defenders or the PLA.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS