The Financial Supervisory Commission under Chairman Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has recently struck a more flexible policy stance toward the implementation of financial technology, or “fintech,” in Taiwan.
In an Oct. 7 meeting with a fintech trade association, commission officials agreed that rules governing fintech development need to be modified, given the progression of the financial sector and the structure of the nation’s economy.
At the Legislative Yuan’s Finance Committee meetings last week, the commission confirmed that Koo met with representatives from the Taipei City Government and Taiwan Financial Services Roundtable on Tuesday to discuss potential sites for a fintech innovation park in Taipei, with the aim of building an industrial cluster where businesses could test fintech concepts.
Lawmakers are working on a preliminary review of a draft bill for a “regulatory sandbox,” which would allow businesses to experiment with fintech innovations in a loosely regulated environment.
Whether a new law is drafted or existing regulations are amended to allow for fintech development, the matter entails a time-consuming — if not extremely bureaucratic — process.
Developing an industrial cluster for this emerging industry will also require money from all parties involved, but the commission’s efforts to promote fintech development in Taiwan are necessary, as the financial sector must keep pace with the fast-changing global market and retain its professionals. The move might also encourage non-financial enterprises to develop innovative products that respond to consumer demand for better services.
There is no question that fintech has become a hot topic, but a report released by the Taipei-based China Credit Information Service last week showed that Taiwan’s financial holding companies appear to be much less committed than their regional peers to this new wave of innovation.
The report said that the financial holding firms spent a combined NT$1.25 billion (US$41.3 million at the current exchange rate) on fintech development last year, or 0.37 percent of the US$11.2 billion spent by their peers in Asia.
Taiwan has a long way to go to catch up with its regional neighbors in fintech investment. Practical concerns over earnings and sales increases, as well as difficulties in transforming fintech ideas into marketable applications, have hindered local institutions from making larger investments in fintech.
Conventional financial services are facing comprehensive changes due to technological advances in mobile communication, big data, cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Rapid advances in digital technology are creating opportunities and challenges for consumers, service providers and regulators unlike anything seen in the past 100 years.
Many question whether, apart from better and innovative services, fintech can address consumer concerns about trust, security and privacy. If financial institutions cannot earn customer trust, how can they expect customers to visit their brick-and-mortar outlets — let alone their digital platforms?
Although there are no quick fixes for this concern, as Taiwan’s fintech development is in its early stages, one certainty is that fintech legislation must be nimble, timely and accommodative.
Meanwhile, the commission must carefully balance the trade-off between efficiency and stability in the face of the rapid changes in the financial sector.
Most importantly, while paying attention to possible disruptions and risks in the financial landscape, the commission must diligently protect consumers in this era of digitization in financial services and ensure that fintech services providers can comprehensively address the issues of security and privacy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with