Outreach to Africa, educational trips for foreign diplomats and a more conciliatory Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu make it clear: Israel is campaigning to overcome its acrimonious relationship with the UN in time to win a coveted spot on the Security Council next year.
Israel is working to rally enough votes in the 193-member General Assembly to defeat either Germany or Belgium in a three-way race for two spots on the UN’s most powerful body.
“They’ve done their campaign with a level of sophistication which is remarkable, doing it systemically, arranging fact-finding missions and bilateral agreements,” Indian Ambassador to the UN Syed Akbaruddin said. “They start with a disadvantage in that there are countries that are not disposed to vote for them, but they have cultivated certain countries to shore up constituencies.”
While the voting is set for June next year, lobbying started much earlier and sometimes resembles a cross between a campaign to win an Oscar and a race for a high-school student council seat. Germany and Belgium started their efforts in 2015 with colorful posters, notebooks and little packets of candy bearing their countries’ campaign logos.
Israel’s run at the Security Council has been in the works for 12 years and now has a powerful ally in US President Donald Trump.
US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley has accused UN institutions such as the Human Rights Council of “chronic anti-Israel bias,” for issuing five resolutions this year against Israel yet none against Venezuela, which is engulfed in civil unrest.
No member has been the source of more controversy at the UN than Israel. The Jewish nation was barred from seeking high-profile seats at the world body until 2000, when it was allowed to join the “Western European and Others” group.
In December last year, then-US president Barack Obama’s administration abstained and let the Security Council rebuke Israel by adopting a resolution condemning its settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as illegal and an obstacle to the peace process.
“The Security Council is the highest level there is in the international arena,” said Yoram Meital, chairman of the Chaim Herzog Center for Middle East Studies & Diplomacy at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. “Israel has been excluded for so long, and it desperately wants to be accepted in the diplomatic world.”
Meital said winning the Security Council seat would let Netanyahu show how successful he has been at reversing Israel’s isolation, especially as he is weakened by a burgeoning investigation of alleged corruption.
One Israeli official said the election might become a political landmine for Netanyahu domestically amid his legal troubles.
Failure to win the UN seat would let rivals call him foolish for seeking acceptance in a club he has long denounced as hostile to Israel, said the official, who asked not to be identified because of the issue’s sensitivity.
That has not stopped Israeli efforts. Last month, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon took nine ambassadors from countries, including Australia, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, to Jerusalem. He had taken 14 ambassadors on an earlier trip in December.
In May, the American Jewish Committee and Danon hosted a dinner meeting for 15 African ambassadors to discuss expanding relations.
Israel has also raised its profile by sponsoring a UN resolution on sustainable development and entering elections for committees that oversee legal and administrative matters. Also in May, Danon was elected to a one-year term as vice president of the UN General Assembly beginning on Sept. 12.
“Every election we enter and every resolution we sponsor at the UN is always a challenge,” Danon said. “Our goal is to strive for full acceptance in every UN agency and forum.”
At the annual gathering of world leaders for the General Assembly in September last year, Netanyahu toned down his criticism of the UN’s alleged anti-Israeli bias and instead touted his nation’s technological achievements. Since then, he has focused on expanding trade ties with China, India and Japan, and reached out to sub-Saharan Africa.
The election “will be a defining moment of Israel’s relationship with the UN,” said Peter Yeo, a vice president at the nonprofit UN Foundation. “Israel is disproportionately and unfairly criticized in a way that other countries are not at the UN and this will normalize Israel’s treatment.”
History suggests Israel, one of 66 countries never elected to the council, faces an uphill struggle to secure at least 128 votes, or two-thirds of the 193-member states, in a secret ballot. Not many of the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation are likely to back Israel, although Netanyahu has visited some Islamic countries, notably Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan.
Winning a seat on the Security Council is the ultimate achievement for many countries, because the body’s 15 members — including the five permanent members with veto powers — can authorize military action, impose economic sanctions and dispatch peacekeepers to trouble spots.
Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has served on the Security Council five times since joining the UN in 1973. Last month, Germany appointed Christoph Heusgen, foreign policy adviser to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, as its new ambassador to the UN in anticipation of gaining one of the two slots.
“Multilateralism is in our DNA,” Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs chief spokesman Didier Vanderhasselt said. “We are one of the founding members of the UN, and as a small state we think we can make a difference.”
Do not count Israel out, said Richard Gowan, a UN expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
One potential twist: With the balloting conducted in secret, Saudi Arabia and its Sunni neighbors might cast their ballots for Israel on the bet it would take a tough stand against their common archenemy Iran.
“I can see Belgium getting squeezed,” Gowan said. “You’d assume that the Arab world may vote against Israel, but you could be surprised.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with