Two typhoons hit Taiwan last weekend, causing flooding in the coastal and low-lying areas in Chiayi and Pingtung counties and in Tainan. While many expressed disappointment at the effectiveness of the government’s flood control measures, others have proposed that the flooded areas be given priority in the water infrastructure part of the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program.
Due to overpumping of groundwater, land subsidence and inferior drainage in the western coastal areas, it is unavoidable that typhoons and torrential rain will result in flooding there.
The main cause this time was the incredibly heavy rain, with Jiadong Township (佳冬) receiving 182mm of rain per hour — more than four times the definition of “heavy rain” by the Central Weather Bureau.
Such levels would cause great damage anywhere in the world. In Chiayi, where rainfall exceeded 200mm in two hours, storm sewers were overwhelmed. Luckily, unlike the catastrophic floods caused by Typhoon Morakot in 2009, flooding this time only occurred in a few areas.
The highest flood reached waist-high this time. Although the floods have caused great inconvenience and financial losses to many people, there have been much worse floods in the past.
Controlling floods in low-lying coastal areas is difficult, as available methods are restricted to building embankments and pumping stations, and other traditional means.
However, these make it difficult to avoid flooding once rainfall exceeds capacity.
For example, the drainage system in Jiadong and Linbian Township (林邊) is designed to handle 400mm of rain per day. The latest flooding in Jiadong was not a result of flawed engineering — it was a natural disaster, pure and simple.
The only way to improve flood prevention is to install larger pumps. However, where will the pumped water go? Discharging it in other areas could worsen flooding there.
To protect urban and high-value industrial areas from flooding, nearby rice paddies were used as temporary retention basins, as they can survive a few days of flooding, while flood control infrastructure costs could be kept lower.
However, rice farmers today might be less willing to cooperate. That would add to the cost of flood control infrastructure and lead to more land expropriation.
If you were a landowner, would you prefer occasional flooding or having parts of your land expropriated for infrastructure such as drainage canals and detention ponds?
Before engineers propose a flood control plan, they have to consider a variety of factors, including society, the environment and costs, with the most important factor being a project’s cost-benefit ratio.
From the public’s perspective, cost-benefit ratios might not always make sense, as people tend to prioritize their own interests and do not hesitate to protest when they feel that these have been tread on.
Since the government has limited resources, infrastructure projects must be cost-effective and prioritized according to their urgency. The government cannot and should not prioritize flood control infrastructure in an area just because of one extreme weather event.
A more difficult problem is that as the nation keeps seeing record-breaking rainfall, the public must be prepared to live with natural disasters as a part of their lives. If people are unable to adapt, the cost of flood prevention investment might become prohibitive as disaster prevention measures fail to keep up with changing hydrological conditions.
Chang Yen-ming is a former deputy director of the Taichung branch of the Water Resources Agency.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with