At an event to mark the 20th anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover to China, Chinese president Xi Jinping (習近平) — who is also Chinese Communist Party (CCP) general secretary and chairman of the Central Military Commission, with power over the nation’s government as well as its military — shamelessly bragged about Hong Kong’s “world-recognized achievements.”
His words served as an ironic contrast to Hong Kongers’ calls for independence.
Under British colonial rule, Hong Kong became very different from China. As a result, the Chinese government had no choice but to promote the “one country, two systems” framework when it took over the territory.
However, now that the territory has become a part of China, Beijing completely reneged upon its promise. The territory has since become difficult for Hong Kongers to live in: While some decided to leave, some stayed in the hope of changing things for the better.
Fifty-two years before Hong Kong’s handover, Taiwan celebrated its return to China after World War II ended 50 years of Japanese rule in the region. Following its defeat by the CCP in China, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) fled to Taiwan and occupied the former Japanese colony.
Under the KMT, Taiwanese have endured the 228 Massacre, the White Terror era and the decades-long Martial Law period and eventually realized that they needed to take control of their own destiny — and that was the beginning of Taiwanese independence movement.
Both Taiwan and Hong Kong were severed from China during the Qing Dynasty and ceded to Japan and Britain, respectively. Under Japanese and British colonial rule, Taiwan and Hong Kong became very different from China.
A major difference between China’s political system — as seen in the KMT and CCP governments — and that of Japan’s and Britain’s is the latter’s adherence to the rule of the law. The rule of law is a basic requirement for civilized nations. That China, which claims to be the motherland of Taiwan and Hong Kong, fails to meet this basic requirement has made it impossible for Taiwanese and Hong Kongers to identify with it.
Beijing’s feelings toward Taiwan and Hong Kong are mixed with bitterness, as it resents that they have been ruled by foreign nations.
Despite euphemisms such as “the recovery of Taiwan” or Hong Kong’s “return to the motherland,” the KMT and Beijing really thought of Taiwan and Hong Kong as places to conquer.
However, the legal and judicial systems that developed in Taiwan and Hong Kong during their colonial eras have made it difficult for the successor to do whatever it wanted. The new government’s complete disregard for law soon sparked outrage among Taiwanese and Hong Kongers.
China’s political culture is rotten to the core. In the name of “recovering” and “returning to the motherland,” both Taiwan and Hong Kong have fallen into the hands of authoritarians. Despite Beijing’s attempts to create the illusion that China, Taiwan and Hong Kong are one country, they are fundamentally different from each other.
The more civilized way would be to allow Taiwan and Hong Kong to become separate nations while remaining a part of the Chinese cultural circle.
China is enormous. It does not need Taiwan and Hong Kong, as one is a small island and the other is a small peninsula. If Beijing would let them become independent, it might feel relieved and even be able to improve its international reputation. Moreover, the Han culture that connects them would continue to thrive in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS