Following the UK’s decision to leave the EU and the election of US President Donald Trump, the rise of right-wing populism in Europe has attracted a great deal of attention.
Although Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom failed to achieve a sufficient majority in the Dutch general election to form a government, it still gained 20 seats in parliament.
Next month it will be the turn of the French to go to the polls and in September, Germany.
The rising tide of popularism in Europe continues to erode traditional democratic values, leaving many deeply concerned for the future of the continent.
Democratic government is founded upon the twin principles of national sovereignty and equality of participation in politics. Democracy works by following the will of the majority, which manifests as rule by the people.
Whether a majority is better placed than a minority to arrive at a wise decision is a question that has repeatedly been posed since the time of ancient Greece.
Democracy provides a way to effect peaceful political change by “counting heads instead of breaking them.” Most important of all, democracy is the realization of the human pursuit of universal human rights based upon humanistic values. For this reason, democratic government is truly superior to all other political systems.
Democracy is not just a question of quantity — the majority view — but is also a question of quality — pursuing the values of human rights.
If a democracy departs from these values, all that will be left is majority rule devoid of virtue or integrity, and it will inevitably lead to a race to the bottom by politicians playing to the populist vote.
At the end of 2010, many in the Arab world rose up during the Arab Spring, which raised hopes of democracy spreading across the region. Few could have predicted that shortly after the tender buds of democracy had begun to develop, the region would be plunged into a series of catastrophic wars, leading to a large-scale refugee crisis in Europe, spiked with the threat of terrorism.
These events have stirred up a strong undercurrent of racism and unleashed a form of populism that is eroding the democratic ideals of Europe.
The refugee crisis is a humanitarian problem. Racial equality and multiculturalism are core to the values of human rights and fundamental to democracy.
Imposing illiberal restrictions on refugees and migrants is unlikely to resolve the problem of terrorism in Europe, but it is a surefire way to overturn precious, hard-won democratic ideals and universal human rights.
From the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to the 1976 UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, European democracies have lead the way, exhibiting a universal compassion and humanitarianism in accordance with the highest traditions of democracy and human rights.
However, parochial nationalism has once again reared its head as a new form of populism. Perhaps it will turn out to be nothing more than a ripple on the water’s surface — a temporary phenomenon — but the warning signs should be heeded nonetheless.
In recent times Europe has led the world. The secret of the continent’s success is in part attributable to democratic government, technological achievement and economic liberalism, but most important of all, it is a product of Europe’s promotion of universal human rights and its strong humanitarian traditions.
Whether Europe or the US, if democratic societies begin to depart from the universal values of human rights, they will cease to become the great societies that they once were.
Ho Hsin-chuan is a professor in National Chengchi University’s philosophy department.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with