The Examination Yuan is in charge of the hiring, evaluation, salaries and retirement of civil servants. Therefore, civil service pension system reform should be one of its main responsibilities, yet as the reform bill is about to be submitted to the legislature, several members of the Examination Yuan have tried to block it.
One member, Chou Yu-sun (周玉山), has attacked the government’s proposal as “vicious, cutting to the bone, leaving victims to bleed without listening to their cries of pain,” while another, Chou Tsu-lung (周志龍), has said that one-third of all retired civil servants will become “low-class old people.”
Many Examination Yuan members have vowed to come up with a counter-strategy.
The opposition to the reform effort within this institution is raising questions about its legitimacy, the work it does, the respect afforded to it and the need for its existence.
The Examination Yuan, one of the five branches of government prescribed by the Constitution, is unique. It was created because Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), looking to the examination system of imperial China, wanted to establish an independent examination power to avoid blind obedience and corruption.
As an independent, constitutionally ordained institution, there are no checks and balances on the Examination Yuan, which directs the systems and personnel plans that lie at the core of government operations. This frequently results in great discrepancies between the government’s personnel appointments and governance, and violates the principle of political accountability.
The Executive Yuan divides personnel administration matters into legal issues that it handles, and administrative issues handled by the Directorate-General of Personnel Administration to accommodate divisions between the five government branches.
This means there is not much for the Examination Yuan members to do. With the exception of a weekly meeting, they take turns chairing and serving as regular members of the Board of Examination and perhaps do some research.
They receive excellent benefits: In addition to a NT$190,000 (US$6,118) monthly salary and other benefits — the equivalent of a Cabinet minister — they also receive operating expenses of more than NT$2 million and a car and driver. Each year, the government spends between NT$70 million and NT$80 million on an Examination Yuan member.
If members are dedicated to their duties, it is reasonable that taxpayers should foot their supporting budget.
Pension system reform used to be the preserve of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration and then-Examination Yuan president John Kuan (關中). It was precisely because the pampered members of the Examination Yuan abandoned their duties that a golden opportunity was missed and reform of the civil service pension system was delayed. The result is that even more drastic cuts to civil service pensions are now required.
Now that the members of the Examination Yuan are dealing with their own vested interests, they are not only neglecting their duties, but have become a stumbling block to reform. This is unacceptable.
The legislature must remove this obstacle by amending the Organic Act of the Examination Yuan (考試院組織法). It might not be possible to abolish the institution, as it is protected by the Constitution, but the number of members and their benefits should be sharply reduced.
Its mode of operation should also be amended, so that draft bills from the Ministry of Examination and the Ministry of Civil Service can be sent directly to the legislature to avoid a situation in which oppositional forces hijack reforms.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with