When Hong Kong lawmakers Edward Yiu (姚松炎), Nathan Law (羅冠聰) and Eddie Chu (朱凱迪), and Hong Kong democracy campaigner Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) visited Taiwan on Friday last week at the invitation of the New Power Party (NPP) they were attacked and followed by Chinese patriots from Hong Kong and Taiwan.
The protesters focused on Law and Wong, who were at the front of the “Umbrella movement,” are internationally active and are seen as “traitors” by Chinese unionists.
Hong Kong is a Chinese territory and the Hong Kong chief executive is a secret member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP); using violence is in their nature. However, that the situation should be the same in Taiwan was unexpected, but maybe not a complete surprise.
Unexpected because although Taiwan is an independent democratic nation, Chinese representatives were allowed to follow and attack Hong Kong independence advocates. On the other hand, it was not a complete surprise, because Taiwanese democracy is not protected by the legal system, which remains under the control of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The events surrounding this incident can be traced back to Dec. 12, when Hong Kong National Party convener Chan Ho Tin (陳浩天) and spokesperson Jason Chow (周浩輝) were beaten by suspected Chinese unionist thugs at the Caesar Park hotel in Taipei because they promote Hong Kong independence. Clearly the thugs were Chinese representatives in Taiwan.
That evening, Chan and Chow were at Taipei Railway Station with the person who had invited them, Democratic Progressive Party member Chu Cheng-chi (朱政騏), when Chu Cheng-chi received telephone call from Xiao Jin (肖勁), a reporter with the Hong Kong-based Pacific Weekly who was visiting Taiwan to interview Chan. As Chan and Chow were to return to Hong Kong the next day, the interview was conducted that evening at a coffee shop near the hotel. Less than 20 minutes after they arrived, seven or eight people sat down next to them. When the interview was over, they started throwing things and assaulting Chan, Chow and Chu Cheng-chi. Hotel staff and Chu Cheng-chi called the police and two officers came to take the offenders away, but another dozen people were following the proceedings. On their way to the Zhongzheng police station there was more violence directed at Chan, Chow and Chu Cheng-chi while police officers were protecting themselves.
Because Chan and Chow were in a rush to return to Hong Kong, they never filed a lawsuit.
Police reportedly submitted a written report to prosecutors, who have done nothing.
A few days later, the same offenders are suspected of assaulting a group of Taiwanese independence advocates in Taipei’s Ximending (西門町) area. Police and prosecutors once again did nothing.
Government agencies have also been attacked on several occasions and people promoting reform have been assaulted by people suspected of working with China, amid Beijing’s threat to use military force against Taiwan.
How could they have known about the meeting? It would not be a surprise if Chu Cheng-chi’s telephone was tapped.
Every time I have participated in human rights forums in China it has been easy to spot KMT and CCP agents, including those from Hong Kong or Japan — Taiwan has become a center for information gathering.
What should the government do to address the issue of these fifth columnists? If it is incapable of dealing with the issue, should civic groups organize self-defense measures to keep us safe and take on the burden of maintaining national security?
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS