Exports account for about 60 percent and imports, a negative item, account for about 50 percent of Taiwan’s GDP. While boosting exports would be the most effective way to stimulate the economy, the government must be careful planning stimulus measures. A high import rate means much of the benefits brought by economic stimulus could go to other countries, while Taiwan would still pay for its costs.
According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the IMF, the multiplier effect of economic stimulus declines as the percentage of imports in GDP goes up. In a more isolated economy, the multiplier effect could be 1.6 times the average. Considering the level of Taiwan’s economic openness, the multiplier is expected to be about 0.6.
Take the typical Taiwanese breakfast for instance: Clay oven rolls, fried bread sticks and soybean milk are all made from imported ingredients. This means an increase in breakfast consumption would mostly benefit the nations that export the ingredients to Taiwan. For the same reason, public expenditure on infrastructure and purchases could have a limited effect on the economy.
Since the 1980s, due to a trend of deregulation in finances led by then-US president Ronald Reagan and then-British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, along with then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) policy to open China’s economy to foreign trade, there was a significant increase in the percentage imports contributed to GDPs. Any kind of national economic impetus generally had a lower multiplier effect, as economic benefits were more likely to spill over to other countries. As a result, governments were less willing to provide economic stimuli.
However, the global economy has changed considerably. The financial crisis in 2008 was the first worldwide recession since the 1930s. After quantitative easing failed, it became clear that only large-scale economic stimulus would save the situation; piecemeal and inconsistent economic policies do not help. G20 leaders know this, but out of self-interest, they prefer to let others initiate it. Even if any national leader was willing to step up, their parliament would probably hold them back.
Therefore, Taiwan must rely on itself to improve its economy. If President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration is planning to make domestic professional caregivers the main workforce for its new long-term care system, such a policy could have a large multiplier effect, as it would benefit domestic providers first and foremost. Additionally, it would allow families with senior members to have more resources at their disposal, which could contribute to the economy by increasing demand.
The same could apply to public childcare. By building a public childcare system with domestic providers, the income of childcare professionals could rise and the financial burden on families could fall.
Free university and preschool education could achieve the same result. If parents no longer needed to save money for university tuition, their purchasing power would increase significantly, and the economic effect would surprise many.
Does Taiwan have the resources to implement those policies? The answer is yes. Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) lowered the Profit-seeking Enterprise Income Tax from 25 percent to 17 percent, causing the treasury to lose about NT$193 billion (US$6.16 billion) per year. NT$193 billion would definitely be enough to pay for it all.
And if implementing those policies means more social benefits, a better economy and more business profits, why wait?
Lin Kien-tsu is a former director of Tamkang University’s Department of International Business.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with