Building global ties
After returning from a backpacking trip in Taiwan, I can see why this nation wants to maintain its independence from the People’s Republic of China.
It is clear to me that Taiwanese live with a strong sense of freedom and enterprise that penetrates deep into society. The “new southbound policy” of extending visa-free access to ASEAN member states is just another example of this: A small nation with a growing tourist sector trying to open up its borders.
Surely this could be an example to China on how to go about building its relations with fellow global partners across the world.
Benjamin Isaacson
London
Flexible holiday solution
With the new legislative session now under way, the government’s proposed “one fixed day off and one flexible rest day” amendment to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) will undoubtedly become a key battleground.
Less than a month after the Mid-Autumn Festival holiday, Taiwan celebrates Double Ten National Day. During extended holiday periods, the low efficiency of Taiwan’s transport network and difficulty in obtaining tickets causes supply problems. In order to guarantee each person the opportunity to purchase a ticket on public transport to return home during holiday periods, it is worth considering a national holiday reform: adapting the current system of “concentrating” public holidays during one period and instead introduce a “staggered” public holiday system.
The east coast transport network during extended holiday periods is a good example: whether putting on additional train services or, as was done during the recent Mid-Autumn Festival holiday, implementing a name-based booking system, demand outstrips supply so that many people continue to be inconvenienced by the “concentrated holiday period” and are packed into overcrowded trains. Such a system even affects the quality of the holiday experience.
Taiwan has transformed from a traditional manufacturing economy into a modern service-based economy. Traditional holiday periods and public holidays have been commercialized and turned into sales platforms for businesses. Concentrated public holidays only exacerbate this trend, while adding an external cost to transportation and travel, as the cost of excessive congestion is borne by those living in remote areas of the nation and who have limited access to transportation.
If the government were able to implement a flexible, staggered public holiday policy, not only would the cost to industry be minimal, it would also help relieve “holiday anxiety” and reduce traffic accidents, while improving the quality of public holidays. It would also make holiday periods feel longer.
Adopting such a system would not only help improve economic efficiency, but it would also be a politically savvy move that would bring the government a lot of kudos. Hopefully a compromise can be reached that satisfies both employers and employees.
Sun Jung-fu
Taipei
Stan Lai’s dream
Regarding the New York Times interview of Stan Lai (賴聲川), it seems the interviewer avoided asking Lai about his involvement in the musical Dreamer — a celebration of the Republic of China’s centennial in 2011 — which cost about NT$258 million (US$8.23 million) and, directed by Lai, failed to meet the expectations of what a good musical should be. (“Theater’s evolving role in China and Taiwan,” Sept. 19, page 19). Its theme and performance were a cliche.
The two-night-only show and its high production costs shocked Taiwan’s struggling artistic community. Since then, Lai has refused to explain himself and his involvement in this scandal, having skillfully stolen money from the public coffers.
Ni Kuojung
Hsinchu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with