In his 1952 novel, Invisible Man, the late Ralph Ellison famously portrayed American blacks as silent, long-suffering and entirely unnoticed by the majority white population. This year, there is a new — and global — invisible class: the 260 million boys and girls who are denied access to basic education.
Today’s invisible victims are refugee children holed up in tents, shacks and hovels who would never enjoy a first day at school; they are the millions of nine-to-12-year-olds condemned to child labor, and the millions of young girls destined for child marriage and denied an education simply because of their gender. Ensuring a better future for these children is the civil rights struggle of our time.
Out-of-school children are losing out because of our failure to invest in education; but so, too, are another 600 million boys and girls who are in school, but not learning. In low and middle-income countries, half of all primary-school-age children do not learn basic literacy and numeracy skills.
All told, 900 million of the world’s 1.4 billion children reach adulthood uneducated or under-educated. According to a forthcoming report from the International Commission on Financing Global Educational Opportunity (the Education Commission), which I chair, members of this neglected majority lack the skills they would need to succeed in a quickly changing global labor market.
In the interconnected world of the future, children will need to be taught information-technology and computational skills if they are to find gainful employment. However, in low-income countries, where technology is most needed to improve educational services and inclusive growth, only 10 percent of pupils attend schools with Internet access.
To close these education gaps, a “business-as-usual” approach is unlikely to suffice. Indeed, by 2030 — the year by which the UN sustainable development agenda promises to deliver universal basic education — 1.5 billion adults would have had no education beyond primary school. Worse still, half the world’s young people would still be entering the workforce with no recognizable qualifications and would probably suffer long periods of unemployment.
For years, the international community has held summits promising to redouble its commitment to education. However, time and again, it has failed to fulfill that promise, thus depriving the next generation of the most valuable gift it could bestow.
In 2002, 13 percent of overseas development aid went to children’s education; today, that figure is 10 percent, and in low-income countries it amounts to no more than US$17 dollars per child, on average.
By short-changing the world’s children, we are squandering the most valuable untapped resource we have. Moreover, we could be setting the stage for a modern doomsday scenario, because an entire generation of uneducated, alienated young people would make easy prey for extremists and terrorist organizations.
Fortunately, how to improve educational outcomes is not a secret: The best schools hire dedicated and competent teachers and administrators, and teach curricula relevant to children’s future needs. Moreover, the Internet enables the poorest children in the remotest areas to access the world’s best libraries and teachers. With auditing and accountability systems, we can make future investments dependent on results, and transform every classroom into a learning hub for every child.
Toward this end, the Education Commission — which includes leaders from government, academia, business and economics — just published a road map and a proposed global budget to provide universal, high-quality primary and secondary education.
Our evidence shows that if developing countries can adopt domestic reforms to match the results of recent success stories, such as Vietnam, they can deliver education for all by 2030.
For our program to succeed, the global investment in education would need to rise steadily from US$1.2 trillion now to US$3 trillion by 2030; and low and middle-income countries would need to modernize their education sectors by increasing their domestic investments to 5.8 percent of national spending, 1.8 percent above the average.
If countries are willing to make this level of commitment, they should not fail to deliver universal education for lack of funding. To ensure that the money is there, the Education Commission is offering detailed proposals to reform the global framework for funding education, and to bring multilateral development banks together to prioritize education and release new resources.
Education is the most cost-effective investment we can make, so the economic case for increased funding could not be clearer. The Education Commission’s goal is to make today and tomorrow’s children a “learning generation.” If we succeed, we expect low-income countries’ per capita GDP to be 70 percent higher by 2050 than it is now.
By contrast, if the world succumbs to inaction and paralysis, we predict that it will cost global GDP US$1.8 trillion by 2050. The brunt of this cost would fall on low-income countries, where 25 percent of populations would still live in extreme poverty. Those are the quantifiable costs of ignoring an invisible generation of young people; the other costs, in terms of lost opportunities and ravaged, alienated lives, are impossible to quantify, but should be equally worrisome.
Gordon Brown, former British prime minister and chancellor of the exchequer, is UN special envoy for global education and chair of the International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who died on Thursday last week, coined the phrase “new Taiwanese” and used it in some of his public speeches. The concept of “new Taiwanese” was an important link in the chain of his political thought. Lee proposed the term in August 1998 on the eve of the anniversary of the end of the Pacific War. His intention was to consolidate a common understanding around the idea of “new Taiwanese,” and to embody the Taiwanese spirit of never giving up and not fearing hardship, and to create bright prospects for generations to come. However, after