News of volunteers helping in Taitung County’s post-typhoon recovery efforts criticizing Amis Aborigines for holding their annual Ilisin harvest festival despite the devastation might not have drawn much attention, but it shows how ignorant mainstream society is about Aboriginal culture and how such a mentality might have a larger impact.
On learning the extent of the damage caused by Typhoon Nepartak that hit the nation earlier this month, leaving Taitung County devastated, many people did not hesitate to join volunteer groups to assist with the recovery efforts.
However, many volunteers said that they were “shocked” to find Amis communities “happily preparing for festivities” when they arrived in Taitung, saying that it gave them a feeling of betrayal.
The so-called “festivities” that volunteers saw are not the carnival or party-like festivities they might have imagined. These “festivities” are the most sacred and important religious event for Amis each year.
Although often translated as “harvest festival” because it is held after the harvest of crops, Ilisin — held throughout June, July, August and September depending on each Amis community’s tradition — is more than just celebrating a harvest: It is an event in which Amis rally, show their solidarity, pass on their traditions and give thanks to ancestral spirits for their blessings throughout the year.
It is not like having party after homes and crops have been destroyed by a storm. Such religious events serve as an important psychological support and play a critical role in the healing process.
It is not only Aborigines — other Taiwanese also have different religious rituals to help heal the harms brought about by a major natural disaster and often the organizing of a traditional festival immediately after a devastating natural disaster would be seen as a symbol of community strength, despite what has happened.
Amis are the most populous Aborigines in the nation and if other Taiwanese cannot understand their culture, it is unimaginable what mainstream society’s level of understanding of other Aboriginal cultures would be.
Earlier this month, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) made himself a laughing stock by saying that Siraya Aboriginal rights activist Tuan Hung-kun (段洪坤) shares the same ancestral lineage as him, since they both have the same family name.
Tuan Hung-kun immediately rebutted Tuan Yi-kang’s claim by saying that his “Tuan” actually comes from the last syllable of the Siraya name of his family, Akatuang, and that changing the last syllable of a Siraya family name into a one-syllable Han Chinese family name that sounds similar was common practice when the Sirayas were forced to Sinicize their names.
A few weeks ago, Tuan Yi-kang also criticized New Power Party Legislator Kawlo Iyun Pacidal for joining Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Aboriginal lawmakers in a protest against the DPP caucus’ refusal to include clauses to rectify injustices suffered by the nation’s Aborigines prior to 1945 in a DPP-proposed bill on transitional justice.
Tuan Yi-kang’s criticism triggered protest from Aborigines, and Pacidal defended her actions by saying that all Aborigines should stand in solidarity for their rights regardless of party divisions.
While many people claim that they love Aboriginal culture and enjoy making friends with Aborigines, most lack a deeper understanding of Aboriginal cultures and history, and such ignorance could lead to ethnic conflict.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with