The financial strains from Britain’s vote to leave the EU are starting to show, as worries ripple through the country’s real-estate market.
In the most prominent sign of the pressure, three major real-estate funds have frozen withdrawals in the past two days, to slow the exodus of nervous investors. By doing so, the funds are trying to prevent a vicious cycle of selling that could force them to dump assets at extremely low prices, deepen losses and prompt more investors to rush for the exit.
The turbulence after the “Brexit” vote has been high, as investors rapidly exchange risky assets for safer havens. Yields on US Treasury securities have touched new lows, while the pound is down sharply. Stocks have been shaky, and shares in some British real-estate companies have shed more than a third of their value.
The three real-estate funds — run by Standard Life, Aviva Investors and M&G Investments — each pointed to heightened levels of stress in the market prompting investors to sell.
A top British regulator on Tuesday highlighted the potential risk to such funds, which invest heavily in assets that are tough to sell quickly.
“The reality is we don’t fully know what the economic impact of the Brexit is going to be,” said Laith Khalaf, a senior analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, a British financial services company. “The concern is it’s going to be negative.”
Authorities around the world are paying close attention to the economic, financial and political fallout of the vote, and have plans to move quickly to keep the damage from spreading too far and too fast. The reverberations could test whether — since the 2007 and 2008 global financial crisis — officials have put in place the necessary measures to protect the broader system from a shock.
The Bank of England on Tuesday said that the environment had become “challenging,” adding that there were “tightening credit conditions” in the commercial real-estate market.
To help provide support for the economy, the central bank cut the buffer that British banks need to keep on their books, a move that should allow them to lend more to businesses and consumers.
“When combined with the already strong balance sheets of UK banks, today’s action means that UK households and business who want to seize viable opportunities in a post-referendum world can be confident they will be supported by the financial system,” Bank of England Governor Mark Carney said on Tuesday. “Financial institutions, like the rest of us, desire certainty in order to plan for the future.”
Funds that invest in the British property market look particularly vulnerable in the wake of the Brexit vote.
Real estate, particularly high-end properties in London, boomed in recent years as interest rates remained at record lows. Investors, in turn, chased yield, creating huge demand for mutual funds that invested heavily in the country’s malls, office towers and residential developments.
While they represent a small piece of the mutual fund world, such investments have ￡25 billion (US$32.38 billion) in assets under management. The Aviva, Standard Life and M&G funds account for about one-third of that market, Khalaf said.
Even before the vote, the signs of stress were apparent in the real-estate market. Ever-rising prices prompted concerns about a property bubble. Construction activity in Britain posted its weakest performance in seven years last month, driven in part by a steep decline in residential construction before the referendum, according to a Markit/CIPS UK Construction Purchasing Managers’ Index released on Monday.
However, the sector has been shaken by new uncertainty since Britain decided to exit the EU. London’s future as a regional hub for commerce is in doubt. Cities across Europe are looking to lure companies and jobs. An economic slowdown is an increasing possibility.
Mutual funds that focus on real estate face a particular problem in the current tumult. Such funds hold assets that are difficult to trade, but investors can ask for their money back at anytime. When investors panic, the redemption requests can quickly exhaust the funds’ cash on hand.
In December last year, a US mutual fund run by Third Avenue ran into a similar problem, reflecting the portfolio’s significant exposure to the riskiest types of high-yield bonds. Rather than unload assets into a difficult market, the managers opted to bar the door.
With withdrawals mounting, the managers at Aviva Investors, M&G Investments and Standard Life decided it was prudent to do the same.
Investor redemptions in the M&G Property Portfolio and its feeder fund “have risen markedly because of the high levels of uncertainty in the UK commercial property market since the outcome of the European Union referendum,” M&G said in a news release on Tuesday.
It said a temporary suspension would allow its managers time to “raise cash levels in a controlled manner, ensuring that any asset disposals are achieved at reasonable values.”
On its Web site, Aviva Investors said that its Property Trust fund, which was worth ￡1.8 billion pounds at the end of May, had been “experiencing higher than usual volumes” of redemption requests.
A day earlier, Standard Life Investments, the asset management unit of the large British insurance company, also halted redemption requests in its UK Real Estate Fund.
It said it had seen an increase in requests for redemptions “as a result of uncertainty for the UK commercial real-estate market following the EU referendum result.”
Such funds are already proving a point of concern for the British authorities.
The Bank of England’s report on Tuesday said that “valuations in some segments of the market, notably the prime London market, had become stretched,” adding that any fall in commercial property prices could be “amplified” by investors and real-estate funds.
“These open-ended funds could be forced to sell illiquid assets to meet redemptions,” the report noted.
At a news conference after the release of the report, Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) chief executive Andrew Bailey said that so-called open-ended real-estate funds faced a structural problem, in that their assets did not “revalue naturally” in the market.
Bailey said it was “sensible” to suspend all withdrawals, because authorities did not want those who “get to the door quickly to get a better deal than those that don’t.”
However, he conceded that the authorities believed there was a mismatch between such tradable funds and their investments in illiquid real estate assets, and needed to look at “the design of these things,” Bailey said.
The Investment Association, an industry group that represents British fund managers, said that the use of suspensions of redemptions is an important tool that prevents fund managers from being forced to sell too quickly and achieve better results for clients.
“Suspension is a mechanism that is laid out under stringent FCA regulations, and when it is employed by one of our members, it shows that the regulations are working as they are supposed to,” the group said.
Additional reporting by David Jolly
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong