There is an Atayal word, spiyang, that refers to behavior that is inappropriate or wrong, but which a person continues to do nevertheless. As I watched the inauguration of the 14th president of the Republic of China (ROC) on May 20, I really did get the sense there was little of the regimented, bureaucratic felt in previous years.
For Aborigines who have been subjected to colonial rule and feel they have not been respected, this year’s event, with different — read non-Han Chinese — ethnic groups and cultures, people from all walks of life, new immigrants — “foreigners” — and Aborigines alike all represented, was certainly a welcome break from the past.
However, during the proceedings, there were two points in the Taiwan zhi guang (“the glories of Taiwan,” 台灣之光) section that were questionable. In the first part about the good fortune of the Aborigines and their rich culture, the narrator said foreign missionaries changed Aborigines’ rather uncivilized conventions, in what was a clearly prejudiced view of Aboriginal culture, together with a misunderstanding of what the missionaries were here for.
All cultures are equal. There is no “better” or “worse” culture. Such a viewpoint has no place in a democratic, civilized nation.
The second part, dealing with Japanese colonial rule, spoke only of the negative aspects of that period. It depicted Japanese invading and suppressing the local populace, but mentioned nothing of the infrastructure Japanese gave Taiwanese. Japanese laid down much of the foundations of Taiwan’s national progress — in agriculture, medicine, arts and literature, education, science and transportation — and these things should have been represented. Surely the omissions were disrespectful to the more than 100 Japanese dignitaries in attendance.
Regarding mentions of Aborigines in President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inaugural address — including re-evaluating Aboriginal history, moving toward autonomy, restoring Aboriginal language and culture and improving people’s lives — it was entirely commendable and worth applauding.
Whether this translates into how the government approaches Aboriginal affairs, and how it develops its policy on education, economics, culture and politics, on all levels of government and in the mountain communities remains to be seen. People must keep an eye on how things progress in that regard.
The government will have to exhibit an entirely new level of commitment and approach to the issues, compared with previous governments, in its first 100 days in power. Hopefully it will, but that does not mean people intend to just sit by to see if the government improves.
It will take Taiwan’s Aborigines working in concert with other nationalities before they see a new dawn. That also means that the nation as a whole needs to face up to the violence the state has visited upon Aborigines and offer an apology.
For Taiwan, it does not matter which party is in control. As far as Aborigines are concerned, they will always be seen as something “other” to the Han Chinese population. If people cannot get beyond stereotypes the nation simply can not achieve true ethnic integration or justice and freedom for everyone.
If Taiwan is to become a free, democratic nation founded on human rights, where justice and compassion reign, Taiwanese have to rectify how they view Aborigines, who have historically been at the wrong end of state violence, and reflect on and change the improper and ill-advised policy toward Aborigines. This will be one of the main bellwethers by which the government will be evaluated.
Omi Wilang is a pastor at the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and secretary-general of the Indigenous Peoples’ Action Coalition of Taiwan.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS