The political fallout from the seizure of Pingtung County-registered fishing boat Tung Sheng Chi No. 16 by the Japan Coast Guard in disputed waters in the Western Pacific on April 24 has its roots in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, signed by Japan on Sept. 8, 1951.
Clause 3 of the treaty says: “Japan will concur in any proposal of the US to the UN to place under its trusteeship system, with the US as the sole administering authority, Nansei Shoto south of 29 degrees north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands), Nanpo Shoto south of Sofu Gan (including the Bonin Islands, Rosario Island and the Volcano Islands) and Parece Vela [known as the Okinotori Islands in Japanese] and Marcus Island. Pending the making of such a proposal and affirmative action thereon, the US will have the right to exercise all and any powers of administration, legislation and jurisdiction over the territory and inhabitants of these islands, including their territorial waters.”
The treaty entrusted the Okinotori atoll to the administration of the US. The name for the island/atoll differs in the English and Japanese-language versions of the treaty. In English it is referred to as Parece Vela Island and in the Japanese version it is the Okinotori Islands. According to the final version of the original English-language agreement, when there is disagreement over interpretation of the treaty in Japanese, the English version would take precedent.
Furthermore, on April 28, 1952, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) signed the Treaty of Taipei with Japan, which reaffirmed the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Despite this, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that the matter should be resolved through international mediation. Since he cannot be ignorant of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, this could be an elaborate deception, designed to test the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan and to deal a blow to the blueprint for regional peace created by late US secretary of state and co-author of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, John Foster Dulles, following the end of the Pacific War.
On April 27, three days after the seizure of the fishing boat, Ma convened the National Security Council. During the meeting, Ma announced the government’s three-point stance on the incident and instructed the Cabinet to adopt measures intended as a rebuke to Japan. On April 29, Ma unveiled a peace memorial on Kinmen Island. Throughout the series of events, Ma worked systematically to fabricate a false impression of peace.
Pan Chung-chiu (潘忠秋), the owner of the boat and the father of its captain, said that the vessel was about 150 nautical miles (278km) from the atoll and before setting off had confirmed its route with the Fisheries Agency and was told it could fish in the area. Despite that, the boat was intercepted, inspected and seized by Japanese authorities while in international waters.
If what Pan says is true, it is reasonable to infer that the Ma administration has tried to replicate the 1874 Mudan Incident, when 54 Ryukyuan sailors were massacred after becoming shipwrecked off the coast of Taiwan, which prompted Japan to send a naval force to Taiwan.
Following the incident, Japan took over the Ryukyu kingdom, while the latest incident has been an attempt to use Pingtung County’s Sialiociou Island (小琉球) to fabricate an incident to allow China to break through the first island chain and set up a situation where it can take over the sovereignty of Taiwan.
The fishermen of the Tung Sheng Chi No. 16 trusted the advice of the Fisheries Agency, but have instead become sacrificial pawns in Ma’s latest sell-off of the nation to China.
Koeh Ian-lim is a director at the Taiwanese Union of Teachers.
Translated by Edward Jones
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS