Beijing has been ramping up its calls for president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus,” with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians playing second fiddle by saying that there would be serious consequences for cross-strait relations if it is not upheld.
However, the remarks of Chinese officials show that Beijing is anxious, and Taipei ought not to bow to pressure.
Beijing has also always said that there would be repercussions — including the suspension of exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait — if Tsai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration refuses to recognize the “1992 consensus.”
The consensus refers to an agreement said to have been reached during a meeting between Taiwan and China in 1992 that both sides recognize that Taiwan and China belong to “one China,” but each side has its own interpretation of what “China” is.
However, since Tsai’s election in January, Beijing has been eager for Tsai to recognize the “1992 consensus,” with a variety of officials and academics urging her to do so.
The DPP’s response to Beijing’s repeated calls and threats has always been that Tsai would strive to maintain the cross-strait “status quo” of peace and stability, while adding that Tsai would acknowledge that representatives from both sides attended a meeting in 1992.
China’s calls might be a sign that Tsai’s calm reaction is making Beijing anxious, as it is about to face a government with a different approach to the cross-strait relationship from that of the China-leaning KMT government it has been dealing with for the past eight years.
Beijing is anxious because it knows that Tsai will not be as “obedient” as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九); it is anxious because the DPP’s landslide victory in the presidential and legislative elections show that the direction of the Taiwan policies it has been employing during Ma’s tenure has failed to turn more Taiwanese toward the “motherland”; it is anxious because “progress” in cross-strait relations might help the Chinese Communist Party regime strengthen its authority in a fast-changing China and it is anxious because it is important for China to get Taiwan on side because of the nation’s strategic position as Beijing seeks to gain influence in the international community — especially as it faces challenges from the US and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region.
China has played down Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) remark during a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington that Taiwan’s new leader should abide by the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution, which considers both Taiwan and the mainland part of “one China.” However, the remark showed that China would be willing to make some compromises if Taiwan recognizes “one China” in some way, even if Tsai is unwilling to recognize the “1992 consensus.”
Beijing’s anxiety and its increased pressure on Tsai do not mean she should submit to its wishes, and worries that cross-strait exchanges might be suspended if Tsai does not recognize the “1992 consensus” are unnecessary.
It could be said that Beijing is increasing its pressure on Tsai before she takes office because it does not plan to sever cross-strait exchanges even if she refuses to recognize the “1992 consensus.”
After all, even during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration — which was considered very unfriendly and even hostile toward China — cross-strait exchanges did not cease, and it should not be forgotten that major progress in cross-strait relations, such as direct cross-strait flights, was achieved during that period.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with