It is said that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) salutes a portrait of the Republic of China’s founding father, SunYat-sen (孫逸仙), every day on entering the Presidential Office Building.
Recently, a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, with a background in a local factional politics, as a way of expressing her loyalty to the party, directed the premier and the legislative speaker in a bow to Sun’s portrait during a question-and-answer session at the Legislative Yuan.
The KMT is a freak of a political party that specializes in going against public opinion. It seized national assets and then converted them into party assets. Now that the public wants to pursue the KMT over its ill-gotten gains, it is secretly selling them off and refusing to return them to the nation. And yet, rather ironically, the party is attempting to force down the throats of Taiwanese its one and only legitimate asset: Sun and his “last will and testament.”
In his last will and testament, Sun refers to two groups of people: “comrades” and “the people.” The testament was intended as a warning to his “comrades” in the KMT; Sun did not leave it as instructions for “the people” about what would come next. This is an undeniable asset to the party, yet the KMT has sought to nationalize Sun and force him and the worship of him upon Taiwanese.
Apart from “Retake the mainland, free our countrymen,” the most frightening political slogan found in government organizations and school assembly halls during the Martial Law era was: “The revolution is not complete, comrades must continue the hard work.”
Even schoolchildren were submitted to the KMT’s brainwashing and had to recite the “father of the nation’s last will and testament” like monks reciting Buddhist incantations.
There is only a three-word phrase in Sun’s last will and testament that is still relevant to Taiwan today: “Awaken the people.”
During the final years of the Qing Dynasty, the revolutionary organization that Sun brought together called on the people to wake up and overthrow the “alien Manchurian Qing rulers” of China.
Prior to the lifting of martial law, the KMT used brainwashing techniques and obscurantist policies to keep the masses ignorant and maintain their grip on power. The KMT made use of the education system and the media, all of which belonged to the party. It wanted to keep Taiwanese in a comatose state from which they would never awake. Those who followed their conscience and spoke out were branded “dissidents” by the KMT and were jailed or forced to go into exile.
The nation’s democratization broke the KMT’s stranglehold on power, but it relied on buying off local groups with party money to maintain their hold on political power while refusing to reform.
Instead, it is the Democratic Progressive Party, together with the participants of the Sunflower movement, that has lead a defiant revolution and had the most outstanding success in “awakening the people” and defeating the corrupt KMT.
The old and decrepit KMT only knows how to ritualistically bow in front of Sun’s portrait. What the party fails to understand is that the “father of the nation’s last will and testament” has turned into a spell from which it cannot break free.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS