Days after Hong Kong’s worst riot in years, the Chinese government’s top official in the territory said the violence was the work of “radical separatists” — the sort of label the Chinese Communist Party has applied to its opponents from Tibet to Taiwan, whose real motive, it says, is to divide China.
Chinese dissidents routinely deny such accusations, but at least one Hong Kong protester said he had no problem with those words, used by the Central Liaison Office director Zhang Xiaoming (張曉明).
“Radical? Yes. Separatist? I have no objection either,” said the protester, Edward Leung (梁天琦), a 24-year-old spokesman for the group Hong Kong Indigenous.
He is among dozens of people charged with rioting in connection with the Feb. 9 clashes.
The violence in the bustling Mongkok district, which left more than 80 police officers and scores of protesters injured, was the most startling sign yet of the rise of a local movement with an appetite for confrontation — and the unlikely goal of a Hong Kong independent of China.
Formed after the so-called Umbrella Movement protests of 2014, which failed in their goal to bring about more fully democratic local elections, Hong Kong Indigenous prefers aggression to peaceful demonstrations, which Leung said were tried in 2014, but failed.
Politically, the group’s long-term goal is ambitious in the extreme: It wants Hong Kong residents to be given a vote on the territory’s future — including the option of independence — after 2047, when Beijing’s promise of civil liberties and a high degree of autonomy for the former British colony is set to expire. Analysts dismiss that as a fantasy.
More broadly, Hong Kong Indigenous, along with similar groups like Civic Passion, champions what has become known as “localism,” a reaction to China’s growing influence over the territory.
Localists call for policies that favor Hong Kongers over Chinese in areas like social benefits and school placement, and for defending Hong Kong traditions that they say are under threat. They have organized protests against Chinese shoppers and even against street performers, who dance to songs in Mandarin, as opposed to Cantonese.
A Hong Kong tradition was a factor in the Mongkok violence, which took place during the Lunar New Year holiday. In past years, the authorities had turned a blind eye to unlicensed street vendors who sold snacks like fish balls and stinky tofu to the holiday crowds, but this time reports circulated that inspectors were preventing Mongkok vendors from selling their wares. (Officials later said that the inspectors had only been patrolling, and that no tickets had been issued.)
Using social media, Hong Kong Indigenous mobilized its followers to “protect” the vendors. Soon, some demonstrators were clashing with the police. At one point, an officer who was coming under attack fired live ammunition into the air — a shocking development in a territory accustomed to peaceful protests. Before long, throngs of men in masks had set fires in the street and were hurling bricks at police officers, who struck back with batons and pepper spray and, in some cases, by throwing bricks themselves.
Leung, who was rallying protesters with a loudspeaker before his arrest, denied that Hong Kong Indigenous had orchestrated the violence, though officials in the territory later said that the group had carried plastic shields to Mongkok.
About 20 of the 69 people who have been arrested in connection with the clashes are affiliated with the group, Leung said.
“If history decides we’re culpable for the violence, so be it,” Leung said, but “if we manage to achieve self-government, or even build a nation of our own, what happened in Mongkok would be called a revolution.”
However, analysts say the idea that China would grant independence to Hong Kong is preposterous.
“The courageous young people of Hong Kong need to read and understand the nature of politics and the political system in the People’s Republic of China if they want to get anywhere in defending Hong Kong rights,” University of Nottingham professor of contemporary Chinese studies Steve Tsang (曾銳生) said. “Politics is the art of the possible.”
Leung said he is taking the long view. He views a strong sense of local identity — and large numbers of protesters willing to fight — as future bargaining chips in negotiating the territory’s fate. In that sense, he said, he welcomed the violence in Mongkok.
“We have proved that we have the mobilizing power to put pressure on the government,” he said.
Not all localists endorse the idea of violent demonstrations, but there are signs that such tactics are gaining support among young democracy activists, many of whom were left disillusioned after the overwhelmingly peaceful Umbrella protests failed to get results.
After the Mongkok riot, the student unions of all but one of Hong Kong’s eight publicly funded universities issued statements in support of the protesters. (The exception, the City University of Hong Kong, has no student union.)
The statements blamed the local government for the unrest, saying it had failed to address a variety of public concerns; one quoted Reverend Martin Luther King Jr, saying: “A riot is the language of the unheard.”
That contrasted sharply with the reaction of Hong Kong’s two largest pro-democracy parties, the Democratic Party and the Civic Party, which quickly condemned the attacks on police. Those parties, some of whose members have campaigned for democracy for decades, are scorned by many younger pro-democracy activists, who said they have accomplished little.
Localists have begun participating in Hong Kong’s electoral politics themselves, with some success. Last year, some localist candidates won seats on neighborhood councils, defeating candidates from established pro-democracy parties.
Leung himself is running for the territory’s Legislative Council in a by-election on Sunday. His platform includes building a desalination plant so that Hong Kong will not have to rely on water from China and discouraging the use of Mandarin in schools.
“We must develop and reinforce a local identity, to draw a line between us and others,” Leung said.
Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), a student leader who played a prominent role in the Umbrella protests, is also forming a political party with the goal of putting a self-determination referendum for Hong Kong on the territory’s legislative agenda — a development that would appall China’s leaders, for whom any talk of separatism is anathema.
Tsang said that the right to self-determination was a reasonable expectation from a democrat’s perspective.
“But Hong Kong is not a democracy, and Beijing will not allow Hong Kong to become one, despite the pretense otherwise,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with