Taking cold seriously
I am a bit surprised how complacent the public seems to be over the news that at least 80 people died nationwide in the latest spell of unusually cold weather.
Unlike an earthquake or torrential rain, this disaster was predicted well ahead of time, yet the central government seemed not to consider it its business.
Municipal-level stuff, perhaps. Indeed, Taipei and other cities set up hotlines and emergency shelters for the homeless.
Yet people died. I hope that, in the future, the government takes such temperature predictions more seriously and works harder to inform people of the risks.
If such a disaster happens again, I hope criticism is much louder. Maybe the public just does not expect much from Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, but I cannot remember so many deaths from a natural disaster since Typhoon Morakot.
Peter Dearman
New Taipei City
Ignorance is a missed chance
Ignoring poll results and various analysis of the changes taking place in Taiwan is unlikely to help the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
It is obvious that the KMT is out of touch with the electorate. If there is not a name change prior to the next election, I think its next result could be worse than the last.
The publicity surrounding the election has thrust Taiwan into the spotlight. It would be unwise for the KMT to miss an opportunity offered to all Taiwanese.
Gavan Duffy
Australia
Ma’s many provocations
After the presidential and legislative elections, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) acted hastily to do China a favor and cause trouble for Taiwan. He ignores what Taiwanese want and tries to implement his deceased father’s will of leaning toward China. He could qualify to be the chief executive of Hong Kong, his birthplace.
Despite strong opposition from the US and Vietnam, Ma visited Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) to “proclaim sovereignty” amid international tension in the South China Sea (Editorial, Jan. 30, page 8).
His original plan to visit the island in December was called off because of US opposition. Running the risk of offending the US, Vietnam, the Philippines and other nations, Ma on Thursday last week made the journey to an island 1,637km from Taiwan with full military escort. This is a provocation.
Many Chinese leaders and netizens cheered Ma as a hero in defending the “common territory” of “the Chinese race.”
In the Singapore meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Ma proclaimed the so-called “one China” principle. On his trip, Ma implied that China co-owns Itu Aba. What a “bumbler” Ma is.
Ma keeps advising the forthcoming administration that the so-called “1992 consensus” is a cross-strait bridge that flows in two directions. It is a one-way bridge of no return.
Ma says that “caretaking” or “idling” are not in his dictionary, implying that he would do whatever he likes, including recruiting foreign white-collar workers, merge Taiwanese and Chinese media, and introduce many other controversial policies.
The new 113 legislators, including 68 Democratic Progressive Party members, were sworn in yesterday. They have to ensure that Ma does not do anything to upset the balance until May 20.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with