Taiwan elected its first female president — Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — in a landmark election on Jan. 16, with her Democratic Progressive Party also securing a majority in the legislature for the first time. The new legislature takes office on Monday, which offers the new Cabinet opportunities to reconsider the long-awaited Free Economic Pilot Zone project and many other significant domestic bills.
The draft special act for Free Economic Pilot Zones mainly focuses on economic liberalization and regulatory loosening, which has faced hurdles as political parties and the public hold different perspectives. The draft also claims its mid-term goal is to create favorable conditions for Taiwan’s entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, so the act’s period of effectiveness has been set at only 10 years.
Special economic zones have been a powerful instrument for attracting foreign investments and boosting economic growth, as evidence in the growth of such the zones in East Asia, Africa and Latin America since the 1970s. However, there are also many examples of failures, where firms have taken advantage of tax breaks and natural resources. Some zones have even been criticized as “pollution havens” for failing to meet international environmental standards.
A World Bank study said that zones that are the most successful in contributing to long-term development go beyond the traditional models of attracting investment and generating employment. This means that successful projects will ultimately deliver structural transformation of the economy. Critical to this process is the degree of integration of economic efficiency with other social and environmental considerations in the domestic economy.
Established in 2012, Enterprise Zones are at the center of the UK government’s long-term economic plan, which adopts a “local enterprise partnerships” approach to create entrepreneurial cultures in local communities and deliver sustainable growth.
As climate change becomes a development challenge, exploring a new paradigm that decouples economic growth from further increases in greenhouse gas emissions is a main task.
The role of special economic zones in promoting climate-friendly development has become critical in policy discussions. The zones can provide an ideal platform for both social and environmental policy innovations, not only because of their enclave nature, but also because they own built-in compliance and implementation mechanisms.
The concept of developing low-carbon “green” economic zones is already being adopted worldwide. Northern European nations have successfully developed eco-industrial parks since the 1960s, such as the Kalundborg Symbiosis in Denmark.
It is expected that greenhouse gas emissions from developing nations will surpass those from developed countries. China, India and South Korea have realized that special economic zones will play a catalytic role in pursuing “green” growth. For instance, South Korea’s Incheon Free Economic Zone sets a clear low-carbon master plan and harnesses foreign investment to fund climate mitigation strategies.
Taiwan published its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions report before the Paris climate negotiations last year. Now it is necessary to consider incorporating this reduction commitment into the next wave of development. Synergising low-carbon and investment policies, the new generation of “green” Free Economic Pilot Zones would provide an ambitious path for long-term sustainable economic development.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate researching international environmental law at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS