Taiwan elected its first female president — Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — in a landmark election on Jan. 16, with her Democratic Progressive Party also securing a majority in the legislature for the first time. The new legislature takes office on Monday, which offers the new Cabinet opportunities to reconsider the long-awaited Free Economic Pilot Zone project and many other significant domestic bills.
The draft special act for Free Economic Pilot Zones mainly focuses on economic liberalization and regulatory loosening, which has faced hurdles as political parties and the public hold different perspectives. The draft also claims its mid-term goal is to create favorable conditions for Taiwan’s entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, so the act’s period of effectiveness has been set at only 10 years.
Special economic zones have been a powerful instrument for attracting foreign investments and boosting economic growth, as evidence in the growth of such the zones in East Asia, Africa and Latin America since the 1970s. However, there are also many examples of failures, where firms have taken advantage of tax breaks and natural resources. Some zones have even been criticized as “pollution havens” for failing to meet international environmental standards.
A World Bank study said that zones that are the most successful in contributing to long-term development go beyond the traditional models of attracting investment and generating employment. This means that successful projects will ultimately deliver structural transformation of the economy. Critical to this process is the degree of integration of economic efficiency with other social and environmental considerations in the domestic economy.
Established in 2012, Enterprise Zones are at the center of the UK government’s long-term economic plan, which adopts a “local enterprise partnerships” approach to create entrepreneurial cultures in local communities and deliver sustainable growth.
As climate change becomes a development challenge, exploring a new paradigm that decouples economic growth from further increases in greenhouse gas emissions is a main task.
The role of special economic zones in promoting climate-friendly development has become critical in policy discussions. The zones can provide an ideal platform for both social and environmental policy innovations, not only because of their enclave nature, but also because they own built-in compliance and implementation mechanisms.
The concept of developing low-carbon “green” economic zones is already being adopted worldwide. Northern European nations have successfully developed eco-industrial parks since the 1960s, such as the Kalundborg Symbiosis in Denmark.
It is expected that greenhouse gas emissions from developing nations will surpass those from developed countries. China, India and South Korea have realized that special economic zones will play a catalytic role in pursuing “green” growth. For instance, South Korea’s Incheon Free Economic Zone sets a clear low-carbon master plan and harnesses foreign investment to fund climate mitigation strategies.
Taiwan published its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions report before the Paris climate negotiations last year. Now it is necessary to consider incorporating this reduction commitment into the next wave of development. Synergising low-carbon and investment policies, the new generation of “green” Free Economic Pilot Zones would provide an ambitious path for long-term sustainable economic development.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate researching international environmental law at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
Ideas matter. They especially matter in world affairs. And in communist countries, it is communist ideas, not supreme leaders’ personality traits, that matter most. That is the reality in the People’s Republic of China. All Chinese communist leaders — from Mao Zedong (毛澤東) through Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), from Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) through to Xi Jinping (習近平) — have always held two key ideas to be sacred and self-evident: first, that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is infallible, and second, that the Marxist-Leninist socialist system of governance is superior to every alternative. The ideological consistency by all CCP leaders,
The US on Friday hosted the second Global COVID-19 Summit, with at least 98 countries, including Taiwan, and regional alliances such as the G7, the G20, the African Union and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) attending. Washington is also leading a proposal to revise one of the most important documents in global health security — the International Health Regulations (IHR) — which are to be discussed during the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) that starts on Sunday. These two actions highlight the US’ strategic move to dominate the global health agenda and return to the core of governance, with the WHA
Just as the cause of the Kursk submarine disaster remains shrouded in mystery — the nuclear-powered Russian submarine suffered an explosion during a naval exercise on Aug. 12, 2000, and sank, killing all 118 crew onboard — it is unlikely that we will ever get to the bottom of the sequence of events last month that led to the sinking of the Moskva guided missile cruiser, the flagship of the Russian navy’s Black Sea fleet. Ukraine claims it struck the vessel with two missiles, while Russia says ammunition onboard the ship exploded and the ship tipped over while being towed
The war in Ukraine continues, and lines are slowly being drawn in the sand. Nations have begun imposing sanctions; few can ignore the reality of Russia’s aggression and atrocities, especially as it edges to the possibility of making a full declaration of war. For Taiwan, this resurrects a different reality, the tangled web of its own complex past and how as a colony of Japan, it became involved with Russia, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Some role reversals are immediately evident. Taiwan is now an independent nation and the CCP rules China. The CCP indirectly