The magnitude of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) recent decisive victory over the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections surprised many. It was so large that for some it might have created an irreconcilable fault line for the KMT.
That DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would win the presidency was expected. However, that she would have a winning margin of more than 3 million votes startled some. Similarly it had also been expected that the DPP would gain seats in the 113-seat legislature, but that it would jump from 40 to an overwhelming majority of 68 seats left observers reeling.
With international observers taking part, the victory has been one that allowed pundits a wide and fertile range from which to give interpretations and projections. For example, one new feature present in the elections was the emergence of several “new” parties dedicated to social causes. This has been called the “third force,” though such judgments seem premature since parties built on social causes have no consistent ideological base to continue to build and too often rely on youth for their causes, who graduate and move on to career development.
Already evident from this was that only one of those new parties, the New Power Party (NPP), was successful; it captured three district seats and two legislator-at-large seats. The rest were left high and dry.
In the legislator-at-large vote, the NPP drew less than the already marginalized People First Party; its votes could be seen as a transfer from the minority Taiwan Solidarity Union, which went from three at legislator-at-large seats to none.
Nonetheless, victory was sweet and long in coming for many and none more so than for the dangwai (黨外, outside the party). These are the people who deserve credit for Taiwan’s democracy and on whose shoulders all that is happening is likely to stand.
The name of this group goes back to the one-party state days of the KMT and the membership is many and almost nebulous. For all in this group the Jan. 16 victory has been more than a victory, it has been a final justification of all their years of work. It is work that should not be forgotten.
The dangwai clearly began to make their mark and draw battle lines for democracy in the 1970s by running in different elections as independents, but the Kaohsiung Incident is where they came to the fore. Stymied by not being allowed to form a party for elections, the dangwai organized a Human Rights Day on Dec. 10, 1979 in Kaohsiung.
The KMT decided to put an end to the movement by disrupting it and using the turmoil as an excuse to arrest not only the ringleaders, but numerous others involved in any related leadership role. Their trials were to be showcase trials of “dissidents,” something that would put them down forever. As an even sterner warning, the murder of Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) twin daughters and his mother while he was in custody awaiting trial was a message that they should desist.
However, the trials only served to expose the one-party state dominance of the KMT, a party that allegedly supported democracy, and the struggles continued into the 1980s. Other dissidents were silenced, Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) and Henry Liu (劉宜良) were high-profile murders, but there were others and many were imprisoned on trumped up charges.
Dangwai became a name to recognize any and all who challenged the KMT. Many of them who studied or worked in the US became blacklisted.
The DPP was formed in 1986 when opposition parties were still illegal, but finally in 1987 martial law was lifted and multiple parties were allowed. The efforts of the dangwai to wrest power from the KMT continued, though now they had the right to belong to a party.
Free elections of the legislature came in 1992 along with the disbanding of the Garrison Command and finally the first direct election of the president in 1996.
Limited success came in 2000 when, by luck, the KMT ticket split and the DPP’s Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) snuck in with 39 percent of the vote. Chen won again by a narrow margin of 50.1 percent in 2004, but the opposition had never been able to control the legislature.
This struggle proved to be a long one and that is what makes this election so special.
The multiparty system and the right to elect legislators were won by the efforts of that nebulous group, the dangwai. High-profile names are evident, but so many contributed silently.
In today’s vote, people would not be allowed to even consider voting for social causes, let alone voting for another party without the dangwai. To vote for a social cause is a luxury that they made possible.
Just as there are still people in Taiwan whose lives were affected by the 228 Incident and the following White Terror era, so too there are few families whose lives have not be affected by the dangwai. This is an important message to be taken from these elections.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with