Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland, countries that long set the standard for welcoming refugees from war and persecution, are rapidly rethinking their generosity as the tide of refugees and migrants arriving in Europe strains their budgets and roils their politics.
The abrupt change in the Nordic nations is one of the most striking consequences of the surge into Europe of asylum seekers from Syria, Afghanistan, Africa and elsewhere this year.
Sweden on Wednesday announced that it would temporarily reintroduce border controls, a move intended to bring order to the process of arrivals, officials said.
Illustration: Mountain People
Sweden has proportionally borne the biggest burden of the refugee crisis and has been calling on its European partners for help.
The welcome mat will not be quite the same, either. Sweden last month decided to offer only three-year residence permits to many new asylum seekers rather than permanent status. The change was part of an agreement the government had to make to get the votes it needed on a new budget.
On Friday last week, Denmark — which had already slashed benefits to new arrivals by about 50 percent, added language requirements and extended the waiting period for permanent residency — announced further restrictions. The changes include allowing the police to search asylum seekers’ luggage for cash or valuables that could be used to help pay for their stays, and requiring refugees to wait longer to bring family members to Denmark.
Norway has said it is to cut benefits to refugees by 20 percent, increase the wait for permanent residency from three years to five and send people back if the situations improve in their home countries.
Finland, faced with mounting numbers of asylum seekers from Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia, last month announced that it now considered some areas of those countries safe and began negotiations with the home countries to step up deportations. Finnish officials then issued news releases in Arabic with details of the new policies.
“We are not telling them not to come, but we are telling them that this is not paradise,” Finnish Department of Migration director-general Jorma Vuorio said.
Getting that message to potential refugees before they try to leave is clearly on the minds of many Nordic officials. Norway used Facebook to announce its changes in English under the title “Stricter asylum regulations for Norway.”
Denmark has advertised its changes in Arabic in Lebanese newspapers.
The changing attitudes are evident to citizens of those countries and to the migrants. In the scramble to find housing for the growing number of asylum seekers, Finland has turned to old army barracks, vacant hotels and even places like a sprawling union training center, with its saunas, pool tables and idyllic lakeside views.
However, on a recent evening, there was plenty of grumbling to be heard at the facility.
Some asylum seekers said they were bored, too far from stores and unable to make do on the monthly allowance they were each getting in addition to free housing and meals.
“If I had known it would be like this, I would have gone somewhere else,” said Ameer, a 27-year-old Iraqi, who sought out a reporter to complain, but did not want to give his last name.
Whether the new, less welcoming posture will help is unclear. A few days after Finland made its most recent announcements, the number of migrants entering the nation dropped slightly, and officials took credit for the change.
However, by the end of last month, the numbers were rising steeply again.
In a news release last week, the Finnish Ministry of the Interior warned that the nation would soon have to resort to putting asylum seekers in tents and containers.
The ministry also said that about two-thirds of the new asylum applications would probably be turned down.
Despite worsening weather, the human stream crossing from Turkey to Greece and then traveling north shows only small signs of abating. Last month, more than 150,000 people, the majority of them Syrian, made the journey, compared with fewer than 8,500 in October last year, according to Frontex, the European border agency. Germany, a nation of about 83 million, continues to be the favored destination and could have 1 million asylum seekers by the end of the year, while hundreds of thousands have headed to the much smaller Nordic countries.
In Finland, the numbers started to climb at a startling pace in August. Already 27,000 asylum seekers have arrived this year, prompting officials to predict at one point that the number could reach 50,000 before the end of the year.
Many officials say such predictions are little more than a guess at this point, and polls suggest that Finns are particularly worried because the refugees, arriving mostly through the border with Sweden, are coming at a time when the nation’s economy is in the doldrums, jobs are scarce and the Finnish government has outlined more than 4 billion euros (US$4.31 billion) in wide-ranging cuts over the next four years.
Sampo Terho, a member of Parliament whose populist Finn Party — formerly known as the True Finns — is part of the governing coalition, said people in a market square had recently asked him: “How can it be that we are doing cutbacks for citizens, but we seem to have an unlimited budget for migrants?”
“That is a very difficult question to answer,” he added. “The man asking that question is my voter. The asylum seeker is not, for the moment.”
As the Nordic countries cut back, each has been carefully watching the others, mindful of setting standards in line with its neighbors so as not to end up as a more attractive destination.
Some experts say that despite their long tradition of humanitarianism, the Nordic nations are simply facing facts.
“They realized they had reached the political limit of what could be done,” said Demetrios Papademetriou, president of the Migration Policy Institute of Europe. “This is going to cost an untold amount of money, and these countries are not wealthy like Germany. They had to turn back.”
In recent weeks in Sweden, various political parties have suggested adopting a raft of new restrictions to stem the migrant flow, with the Christian Democrats even advocating the building of transit camps on the border.
“We are hearing new suggestions from political parties every 10 minutes,” Stockholm University migration politics expert Livia Johannesson said. “You really can’t keep up with all the suggestions.”
Johannesson said polls indicate that most Swedes remained proud of the country’s commitment to welcome the needy. However, the nation might be paying for its high-mindedness, with few of their neighbors inclined to help them.
“I think some of our neighbors are saying: ‘You Swedes, you always want to be best in the class. Now you have to deal with it,’” she said.
At the former training center, some asylum seekers, most of whom are from Iraq, said they had researched their options when they decided to make their way to Finland. They believed it was more lenient in accepting asylum applications from their country.
Some said they had come to Finland simply because Germany seemed too full.
Some, like Rasha Ibrahim, a 30-year-old teacher who came from Baghdad with her husband and two children after a bombing killed her mother, said they had no idea where they were going when they put themselves in the hands of smugglers.
“I just said: ‘Take us to a safe place,’” she said.
While others complained about being more than an hour’s drive from Helsinki with no jobs or educational opportunities in sight, she said she could not be more delighted with the beauty and the quiet of the center.
Ameer, who said his parents had financed his journey to Europe because he had gotten into an argument with a Baghdad militia leader, said that he was tired of sitting around and that he wanted a job or to go to school.
“It would be like heaven to go on vacation here, but we are learning nothing right now,” he said. “Most of us do not have our own money. I went to the store and my aspirin was 10 euros. The allowance they give us is not enough.”
Already, 1,000 Iraqis have decided to return home since the beginning of the year, Finnish officials say.
Additional reporting by Johanna Lemola
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with