The abolition of China’s 35-year-old one-child policy closes one of the darkest chapters in the nation’s history.
In the late 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), determined to boost economic growth, decided that population control was the answer. Millions of abortions, sterilizations and infanticides later, its chickens are coming home to roost.
In raw numbers, the policy’s human toll has been even greater than that of Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Great Leap Forward, which caused a famine that killed about 36 million people from 1959 to 1961. And it exceeded that of the Cultural Revolution, in which large-scale political violence likely caused as many as another 10 million deaths from 1966 to 1976.
Illustration: Mountain People
As for the one-child policy, data released by the Chinese Ministry of Health in 2013 indicate that from 1971 to 2012, 336 million abortions — more than the entire US population — were carried out in registered facilities alone.
Though the one-child policy was not introduced until about 1979, other family-planning policies were already in place at the time.
The Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, the government agency responsible for enforcing the one-child policy, reports an even higher figure: more than 13 million surgical abortions each year — a figure that does not include abortions induced by drugs or carried out in unregistered private clinics.
Of course, it is impossible to know precisely what share of those abortions can be attributed to enforcement of the one-child policy.
In India, where abortion is legal and no comparable family-planning policy exists, the figure is significantly lower — though probably not as low as the 630,000 annual figure provided by the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; it is probably closer to 6 million per year.
Although there is undoubtedly an economic disparity between India and China, their populations are roughly equal. So it is reasonable to estimate that as many as half of China’s abortions — about 6.5 million registered surgical abortions, plus untold numbers of drug-induced or unregistered abortions per year — are attributable to the one-child policy. This implies that there were upward of 200 million abortions over the policy’s 35 years.
These figures — however shocking — do not capture the harsh economic consequences brought about by the one-child policy.
Media often reported stories of unspeakable brutality by local officials against pregnant women and families who violated the policy — a unique savagery captured in Ma Jian’s (馬建) novel The Dark Road.
In a much-publicized 2012 case, local officials in Shaanxi Province forced a woman to undergo an abortion seven months into her pregnancy.
Beyond physical and emotional trauma, those who contravened the one-child policy — people who are most often among the nation’s poorest — face serious economic penalties.
Provincial sampling suggests that the Chinese government collects about 20 billion yuan (US$3 billion) per year in family-planning fines. And local officials in many localities explicitly threaten violators with other harsh punishments, including destruction of their houses and confiscation of their farm animals.
The one-child policy’s long-term demographic consequences have been devastating as well.
According to official data, China’s old-age dependency ratio — the ratio of those aged 65 and over to working-age people, aged 15 to 64 — currently stands at 13 percent. As the one-child generation ages — adding about 10 million retirees annually — this ratio would skyrocket, with the labor surplus that supported China’s economic miracle giving way to a severe shortage that depresses growth.
Equally problematic is China’s alarming gender imbalance. Families’ preference that their one child be male led to innumerable sex-selective abortions, as well as female infanticide and abandonment.
As of 2013, males aged under 24 outnumbered girls by 23 million, implying that more than 20 million young men would not be able to find marriage partners in the coming decades.
The most sobering lesson from this tally of the one-child policy’s toll on China lies in the simple fact that the authorities were able to enforce it for so long.
In fact, China is the only nation in history where a government has actually succeeded in using coercion to limit its people’s reproductive choices. The key is its unconstrained one-party regime, underpinned by a huge and powerful bureaucracy.
Outside observers often marvel at the CCP’s capacity to get things done — at least when those things are the construction of super-modern cities and a high-speed rail network. Seldom do they note the disastrous consequences when the CCP applies its power in stubborn pursuit of a brutal and destructive objective.
Now is the time to recognize those consequences, particularly given that China’s leaders are not done limiting their citizens’ reproductive choices. On the contrary, they are simply moving from a one-child policy to a two-child policy.
Outsiders and Chinese alike must emphasize the senseless cruelty that such measures imply and work to ensure that they are never seen again — in China or anywhere else.
Minxin Pei is a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College and a non-resident senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with