The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) replaced its original presidential candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — who swore she would rather die than pull out of the race — with Chairman and New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), while Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) was left with a consolation prize.
This left many asking why Wang did not replace Hung. Why did he just receive the consolation prize?
The official answer Chu and his supporters have given to this question is that more people supported his candidacy in the polls.
However, the point of Chu replacing Hung was never about winning the presidency for the KMT, because that is seen by many as a lost cause at this point. The actual point is maintaining the number of legislative seats.
This being the case, would not it be more effective to have Wang run and let Chu continue as mayor?
This is a tricky question for Chu and his team to answer. Everyone knows that Chu received the nomination because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who would stop at nothing to get Wang out the door, would not agree to having Wang as the party’s presidential candidate.
The deep-blues within the KMT despise Wang’s Taiwan-centric stance, while Hung and her “red-hot blues” hate him even more. This does not leave Wang with many options for getting enough support to become a presidential candidate.
What exactly is Wang’s role in the KMT? Chu says that Wang is a treasure for the party, but then why is it that he is only permitted to carry the sedan chair for other gods and is never allowed to be a leader himself?
Chu is the embodiment of the KMT elite’s mentality, which was revealed in a confidential conversation with former American Institute in Taiwan director Stephen Young, which was reported in WikiLeaks.
Before Ma took office, Young allegedly told Chu that if Ma were to be elected president, the US government would cooperate with him. Chu told Young that this would mean working with Ma, former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起), then-Taichung mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) and Chu himself: a latter-day Gang of Four.
This exclusive club identified by Chu did not include the other sedan chair carriers, former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), Wang or Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義).
Ma has let the KMT decay and today the party is about to be ousted. The so-called “1992 consensus” that Su has admitted making up has been successfully retired and Chu thinks that Wang is a nobody.
Wang was always held up as the leader of the KMT’s Taiwan-centric faction, but that has become synonymous with corrupt local factions. It is also something of a byword for the KMT’s election bribery system: relying on party assets to get elected, supporting the party elite to conquer the world and using the KMT’s legislative majority to prevent any substantive reform.
At this historic moment in time when Taiwanese voters are preparing to overthrow the corrupt and chaotic KMT regime, Wang and his faction do not have any reason to become public enemies. There is no need for him to continue carrying a sedan chair in the KMT parade.
Wang is 74 years old. Since he cannot reform the KMT, he should just leave it. Why would he continue to be willingly vilified by the very people he is carrying around?
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Clare Lear
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS