History provides a record of social activity and acts as a tool for dialogue between modern society and the past.
Truth and objectivity are two fundamental elements that are exposed through the writing of history. History provides images of warmth and prosperity, as well as death and hardship. It is populated with noble and honorable figures, as well as lowly and contemptible figures. Some issues might feel sordid or shameful when talked about, while others might sound stupid and make people feel uncomfortable. It is historians’ responsibility to interpret and record historical facts. Any intentional editing, removal or embroidering of these facts is inappropriate.
In a recent interview with the Japanese magazine Voice, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said that “70 years ago, Taiwan and Japan were one country, and since they were one country, it is of course not true to say that Taiwan participated in China’s War of Resistance Against Japan.”
On Tuesday last week, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), a political novice, made the mistake of telling China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Liaison Bureau Director Liu Junchuan (劉軍川) that “with the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, it was you who pushed us out of China, threw us away.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) strongly criticized Lee for “voicing such pro-Japanese flattery that only sells out Taiwan, humiliates the people and degrades himself.”
He also said: “How does this respect the sacrifices of Taiwan’s forefathers in the War of Resistance Against Japan?”
Of these three people, one a senior, popular, former politician, one a politician whose time has come and gone, and one a political novice, who speaks the truth and who is a subjective hypocrite?
Lee and many others who lived through Japanese colonial rule and the military rule of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) are still alive. They are the most valuable witnesses of World War II, they have their own individual experiences and they have lived through the psychological process and frustration of transforming from “Japanese” to “Chinese.” When people who did not live through those times do not respect older generations’ rights to speak about their own life experience, and refuse to try to understand or accept it, they are distorting and smearing their experiences, and that is a matter of intolerable harassment.
Ko’s choice of words when he said that “you who pushed us out of China, threw us away” was both careful and polite, and compared with the historical fact that China sold Taiwan out to Japan and turned it into a living hell, it could be said that it avoided the important issues and made light of what happened. Ko clearly has not cleansed himself of the residue of China-centric textbooks.
Leaving aside the fact that Ma and the Chinese behind him first sold Taiwan down the river and forced Taiwanese to struggle for their survival, enduring humiliation and hardship, they still are not ashamed of blaming others for allowing China to cede Taiwan to Japan “in all perpetuity,” but not allowing Taiwanese to be Japanese. It makes the severity of the split personality and mental confusion of such Chinese people self-evident. Ma’s connecting the anti-Japanese resistance of former high-ranking Taiwan-born General Lee Yu-pang (李友邦) to Taiwan’s resistance against Japan during World War II, but then ignoring the fact that Lee Yu-pang was executed in 1952 for joining the Chinese Communist Party, makes it all too clear that he is trying to intentionally edit and embroider history.
Lee Teng-hui, who was president during the talks between Taiwan and China in the early 1990s, keeps saying that the so-called “1992 consensus” is a fabrication, and former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) has admitted that he made up the phrase. Still, Ma, who was not part of the inner circle, is using the “1992 consensus” as a test balloon for relations with China, giving the Chinese leadership no choice but to sing the same tune.
However, the movie The Cairo Declaration, filmed in China, places former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) at the Cairo Conference. That China continues to forge modern history makes it clear that history written by Chinese can only be described using two words: deceit and fabrication.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Perry Svensson
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS