History provides a record of social activity and acts as a tool for dialogue between modern society and the past.
Truth and objectivity are two fundamental elements that are exposed through the writing of history. History provides images of warmth and prosperity, as well as death and hardship. It is populated with noble and honorable figures, as well as lowly and contemptible figures. Some issues might feel sordid or shameful when talked about, while others might sound stupid and make people feel uncomfortable. It is historians’ responsibility to interpret and record historical facts. Any intentional editing, removal or embroidering of these facts is inappropriate.
In a recent interview with the Japanese magazine Voice, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said that “70 years ago, Taiwan and Japan were one country, and since they were one country, it is of course not true to say that Taiwan participated in China’s War of Resistance Against Japan.”
On Tuesday last week, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), a political novice, made the mistake of telling China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Liaison Bureau Director Liu Junchuan (劉軍川) that “with the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, it was you who pushed us out of China, threw us away.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) strongly criticized Lee for “voicing such pro-Japanese flattery that only sells out Taiwan, humiliates the people and degrades himself.”
He also said: “How does this respect the sacrifices of Taiwan’s forefathers in the War of Resistance Against Japan?”
Of these three people, one a senior, popular, former politician, one a politician whose time has come and gone, and one a political novice, who speaks the truth and who is a subjective hypocrite?
Lee and many others who lived through Japanese colonial rule and the military rule of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) are still alive. They are the most valuable witnesses of World War II, they have their own individual experiences and they have lived through the psychological process and frustration of transforming from “Japanese” to “Chinese.” When people who did not live through those times do not respect older generations’ rights to speak about their own life experience, and refuse to try to understand or accept it, they are distorting and smearing their experiences, and that is a matter of intolerable harassment.
Ko’s choice of words when he said that “you who pushed us out of China, threw us away” was both careful and polite, and compared with the historical fact that China sold Taiwan out to Japan and turned it into a living hell, it could be said that it avoided the important issues and made light of what happened. Ko clearly has not cleansed himself of the residue of China-centric textbooks.
Leaving aside the fact that Ma and the Chinese behind him first sold Taiwan down the river and forced Taiwanese to struggle for their survival, enduring humiliation and hardship, they still are not ashamed of blaming others for allowing China to cede Taiwan to Japan “in all perpetuity,” but not allowing Taiwanese to be Japanese. It makes the severity of the split personality and mental confusion of such Chinese people self-evident. Ma’s connecting the anti-Japanese resistance of former high-ranking Taiwan-born General Lee Yu-pang (李友邦) to Taiwan’s resistance against Japan during World War II, but then ignoring the fact that Lee Yu-pang was executed in 1952 for joining the Chinese Communist Party, makes it all too clear that he is trying to intentionally edit and embroider history.
Lee Teng-hui, who was president during the talks between Taiwan and China in the early 1990s, keeps saying that the so-called “1992 consensus” is a fabrication, and former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) has admitted that he made up the phrase. Still, Ma, who was not part of the inner circle, is using the “1992 consensus” as a test balloon for relations with China, giving the Chinese leadership no choice but to sing the same tune.
However, the movie The Cairo Declaration, filmed in China, places former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) at the Cairo Conference. That China continues to forge modern history makes it clear that history written by Chinese can only be described using two words: deceit and fabrication.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS