Typhoon Soudelor caused a manifold increase in the turbidity of Taipei’s water supply. Residents flocked to stores to buy bottled water and the Taipei City Government was heavily criticized for its handling of the situation, as it is responsible for the management of catchment areas, including the Feitsui Reservoir.
Former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) called on Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) to look into the matter. Ko said the muddy water came from the Nanshih River (南勢溪), and that the central government should check the river upstream, while the Forestry Bureau has said the problem was caused by a road collapse. The Ministry of Economic Affairs blamed the city government for its decision to release muddy water into the water treatment plant.
The mud-slinging between the local and central governments did little more than make things more murky. The priority should be to ascertain the source and to identify the culprit: Only then can a permanent solution be found. Next, the response measures must be analyzed, so the operating procedure can be changed in anticipation of future weather events.
The Feitsui Reservoir takes water from the Beishih River (北勢溪), not the Nanshih River. Aerial photographs show the Beishih catchment area is fine, and that there are no serious issues with the Feitsui Reservoir. It is only at the Gueishan (龜山) stretch of Sinwu Road, downstream from where the two rivers converge to become the Sindian River (新店溪), that their waters enter the Chihtan Purification Plant. It follows that the water that enters the reservoir from the Beishih River is not the problem: It was the Nanshih River that brought the muddy water into the plant.
Chihtan cannot handle water that muddy. The problem is entirely sourced in the upper Nanshih River and, irrespective of whether the mud came from a landslide along the Dongjhakong River (東札孔溪) or from the collapse of Sinzeng Road, the ministry or the bureau should come up with a solution.
Government officials say land maintenance is being conducted along the Nanshih River, but in this case the typhoon was too strong. While partly true, it also shows the government’s efforts fall far short of holding off nature’s destructive power.
Even when the muddy water flowed into the purification plant, there was still the option of closing the flues to prevent the water from getting into city supplies, although this would have meant cutting off the supply for several days. The choice between cutting the water supply and allowing muddy water into the supply was a major decision, and Deputy Taipei Mayor Teng Chia-chi (鄧家基) confirmed that the city government chose the latter. When the typhoon had passed, it had to accept residents’ complaints that they were supplied with muddy water, had to buy bottled water and had to clean water tanks.
The Taipei City Government needs to amend its standard operating procedure. Before a weather event such as this typhoon, it should remind the public to stock up on water, so that if the water turbidity exceeds recommended levels, the purification plants can be shut down and the water supply cut off. When the water clears, the supply can come back on. It is just that in a typhoon’s aftermath, when people want to clean things up, if there is suddenly no clean water, it is no surprise that they get angry. Here it came down to choosing the lesser of two evils.
The war of words over this issue demonstrates that even in public policy debates, political agendas get in the way of different levels of government, government departments and political parties. Nobody is interested in finding the facts; it is all about shirking responsibility and pointing the finger of blame. This attitude does not help prepare the nation for the next weather event or improve disaster response procedures. This is the greatest disaster that the public faces.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS