Former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) recent visit to Japan has sparked controversy. It not only sent shock waves through Taiwan’s political circles, but also had an impact on the fraught relations between Japan and China. Moreover, it added new variables to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to China next month.
There are two focal points to Lee’s most recent visit to Japan. The first concerns the reported meeting between Lee and Abe.
Taiwan’s media have reported that Lee had a private meeting with Abe at Lee’s hotel, despite denials from Abe himself and from Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga.
However, Japanese media, including the Sankei Shimbun, believe it did take place. Lee’s hotel was the Capitol Hotel Tokyu. The hotel is only 20m across the road from the Japanese prime minister’s official residence. Abe dines at the hotel’s restaurants quite frequently, and that is where the meeting is said to have taken place. If the meeting did indeed take place, it would be the first time that an incumbent Japanese prime minister has met with a former president from Taiwan. If it set a precedent, needless to say, it would affect relations between Japan and China.
The second focal point concerns the controversial remarks that Lee made in Japan: He said that the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan and claimed by both Taiwan and Japan, belong to Japan; he praised Japan’s colonial rule in Taiwan prior to World War II; and he said he has high regard for the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan, which is a bone of contention in Japan.
His statement that Japan owns the Senkaku Islands was especially controversial, in that it contradicts the current stance of both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). On one hand, it was an embarrassment to DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who Lee supports and who, like Lee, is in the pan-green camp. On the other hand, it prompted the KMT to accuse Lee of forfeiting national sovereignty and humiliating the nation, saying it would consider the removal of Lee’s privileges as a former president.
Since stepping down as president, Lee has visited Japan on seven occasions. It was not the first time that he made a public remark about the Senkaku Islands. However, Lee’s most recent visit to Japan has become extremely controversial because it took place less than two months ahead of Abe’s planned visit to China. Lee’s visit will inevitably add difficulties to Abe’s visit to China and make already fragile Sino-Japanese ties even harder to mend.
In November last year, Japan and China reached four agreements, which improved their relationship to some extent. However, this year marks the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II and Beijing is making exceptionally conspicuous preparations for a grand-scale military parade to commemorate China’s victory in the war against Japan, which is not being well received in Tokyo. The talk that Abe is scheduled to deliver on Saturday next week on the end of World War II has attracted considerable pressure both abroad and at home. Beijing has exerted its pressure by linking the speech with Abe’s visit to China next month, laying down three conditions that Japan must satisfy — strict compliance with the principles of the Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the other three agreements, maintaining the spirit of the Murayama Statement and forbidding its prime ministers from paying respects at the Yasukuni Shrine.
However, there is no way Abe would make a public pledge not to visit the Yasukuni Shrine, and now Lee’s visit to Japan has infuriated Beijing, which berated the Abe administration for allowing and accommodating Lee’s visit to campaign for Taiwanese independence and providing a political platform for advocates of Taiwanese independence.
Although this has added new variables to Abe’s visit to China, Beijing has left some room to maneuver. In fact, China also finds itself in a rather awkward situation. Beijing has issued an official invitation to Abe to attend its military parade on Sept. 3, which Beijing knew that Abe would decline. Meanwhile, Abe shrewdly seized the opportunity to visit Beijing while avoiding the day of the parade, creating the impression that he is working to improve Japan’s relations with its neighbors and thus mitigating the enormous domestic opposition to the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan.
Beijing has once again done something that gives Abe an edge and finds itself in a dilemma over Abe’s visit. If Beijing allows Abe a visit with no strings attached, Abe will take advantage at no cost to his administration, but if Beijing sets out a number of conditions, that will display a lack of sincerity on Beijing’s part, which will result in antipathy toward China among the Japanese public and, as a result, sympathy and support for Abe will rise.
Lee’s visit to Japan was a really clever move.
John Lim is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Modern History and an adjunct associate professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with