The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) less-than-one-minute nomination procedure to name Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) as its presidential candidate appeared almost surreal: The party chairman asked for approval from the National Congress attendees and then believed he received it as the venue resounded with cheers and applause.
However, the surrealism emanated not from the formalism of the demonstration, but the inconsistency between the nomination and Hung’s words.
It was not the formalism of the nomination that was to blame — although it did remind many of those political institutions that use the public’s representatives as a rubber stamp — and included the attendees reciting Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) will — the voicing of which is the prelude to weekly KMT Central Standing Committee meetings — and ending the meeting by chanting the “code of conduct to be adhered to by party members.” Such vocal drills are as harmlessly illusory as the “Republic of China” (ROC) that calls for the retaking of mainland China, yet serves as the backdrop for a sovereign Taiwan.
What brought this deceptive backdrop to the fore was Hung’s accidental elevation to the party’s A-list. A devout believer in the KMT and the ROC, she has anachronistically vowed to make the party hew to its promises of the ROC’s eventual “reunification” and being a guardian of an ROC-centered historical view.
Hung’s nomination, which was the result of a miscalculation on the part of KMT heavyweights, indicates the retreat of the middle-of-the-road forces within the party with the acquiescence of the top echelons. In the name of solidarity, the party leadership has chosen to align with its most rabid deep-blue supporters and expelled those who dare to think outside the box.
There was so much irony in Hung talking about tolerance, justice and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) not having apologized for what it has done; the KMT has never apologized for what it did during the Martial Law era and likes to claim that it led Taiwan’s democracy to earn the world’s respect.
It was cringeworthy when she said that she was fond of Beautiful Island — a song about treating Taiwan as the motherland that was banned by the former KMT government before martial law was lifted — before pledging that the ROC, its name and its symbols were the party’s top priority. She also repeated the historically questionable claim that the ROC was “proudly founded by the KMT.”
That she then switched from Mandarin to Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) to discuss her family’s humble background only highlighted her disconnect from the reality of modern-day Taiwan.
The KMT as the ruling party for years did everything it could force Mandarin down everyone’s throats, with the KMT government restricting the use of Hoklo, Hakka and Aboriginal languages. After the DPP government launched a drive to broaden the use of languages other than Mandarin, Hung once proposed limiting the accreditation program for teaching Taiwanese by cutting its budget, saying the move would save taxpayers’ money.
Much of the KMT’s political travails over the past decade and a half can be traced to its inability to evolve with the times.
By catapulting Hung to the top ranks of the party, the KMT has reaffirmed its dinosaur mindset, and comments from some of the rank-and-file showed that Hung is far from alone in her disconnect from reality. This is evident from remarks like: “The KMT’s drubbing in the nine-in-one elections last November was the public letting [the party] down, not the other way around,” and the Sunflower movement evolved “because [the KMT] withdrew from campuses and the media [after democratization], we should start to restation our men in them.”
It is a clear case of the blind leading the blind.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS