The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decision on Thursday to expel five senior members for making critical remarks against the party shows that the specter of its authoritarian past still haunts it, and that the destiny of reforms vowed by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) might be doomed.
Accused of making remarks on political commentary and doing harm to the party’s image, former legislator Chi Kuo-tung (紀國棟) — who lost his status as a lawmaker after his party membership was revoked — Taipei City Councilor Lee Ching-yuan (李慶元), former Taipei City councilor Yang Shih-chiu (楊實秋), former legislator Chang Sho-wen (張碩文) and alternative Central Committee member Lee Po-jung (李柏融) were expelled from the party.
Chu, who vowed to reform the party when he took over as party chairman earlier in the year, seems to have forgotten his promises, as he even said: “It is unacceptable for party members to wave a blue flag to oppose the blue flag.”
In that statement, he was adapting the phrase “waving a red flag to oppose the red flag,” which refers to those who pretended to adhere to Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) teachings to oust him during the Cultural Revolution.
The reason for revoking their membership seems ridiculous and out-of-place for a party that claims to be democratic in the 21st century; especially when the KMT has just criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of breaching freedom of expression by reporting false accusations against the DPP to the police in the same week the KMT made the decision to expel the five members.
Among the five people who were expelled, Chi — even though he criticized the party on political commentary shows — has always been a loyal member. In fact, he has always defended President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT whenever they were under attack from the public.
During legislative meetings, Chi never hesitated to defend the KMT government’s legislative proposals and voted according to the party caucus’ directions.
By making such a decision, Chu is in no doubt manifesting that he does not like people who speak the truth when the party does something controversial. If he were the emperor in the story The Emperor’s New Clothes, he would likely have the kid who spoke the truth arrested or executed.
Although it is the KMT’s own business, the repercussions might be more serious than causing harm to the party.
What are officials and government employees to do when they hold different ideas about public policy from those at the top? They might choose to keep quiet so they can keep their job.
Even though the KMT administration has less than one year left in power, it could still do much harm to the nation with its wrongful policies, especially considering it has already done a lot of damage.
As most polls show, the KMT is likely to lose next year’s presidential election, and if it keeps the tradition of not leveling criticism after losing the election, it might be difficult for the KMT to return to power in the near future — though it might not be such a bad thing for Taiwan.
The Martial Law period has been over for nearly three decades, but it seems like the KMT still has a long way to go.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with