On the final day of the past legislative session, the legislature finally passed four maritime-related bills. The legislation covered the establishment and governance of a maritime commission, a maritime conservation administration and a national maritime research institute as part of the commission, as well as placing the Coast Guard Administration under the management of the commission.
The legislation is a significant step toward unifying the management of Taiwan’s diverse and complex maritime affairs. However, it would be a mistake to believe that Taiwan is making great strides toward becoming a true maritime nation — and the public must pay close attention to the next stage of the process.
Oceans perform a variety of functions, including climate regulation and oxygen production. Oceans are also habitats for marine life that provide a bountiful supply of food and medicines.
The annual economic output of the world’s oceans has reached US$2 trillion. With land-based resources being depleted daily, there has been a global surge toward “ocean enclosure” activities and land reclamation projects that seek to expand the exclusive maritime territory of countries. This has led to unending conflict, with the South China Sea disputes being an obvious example, the importance of which cannot be underestimated.
The WWF estimates the value of the global maritime economy to be about US$2.5 trillion and that on average it grows by 11 percent each year. It predicted that by 2020 the annual value of the world’s maritime economy would exceed US$3 trillion. Furthermore, 61 percent of current global economic output is closely connected to seas, oceans and coastal areas.
Developed economies have consequently been focusing development of the maritime economy according to their own unique characteristics. For example, the Japanese government has focused on development of four main areas: ports and commercial shipping; coastal tourism; fisheries; and offshore oil, which account for 70 percent of the economic output of Japan’s maritime industry.
The US’ maritime economy is valued at US$258 billion, the equivalent of about 4.4 percent of its GDP, which surpasses its agricultural sector. In the US, development is focused on mineral extraction, tourism and sea-based transport.
China in recent years has been actively expanding its maritime economy, which in 2013 was valued at over 5.4 trillion yuan (US$869.8 billion), or 10 percent of its GDP.
What has Taiwan been doing regarding the development of its own maritime economy? Taiwan lacks a comprehensive and sustained set of basic information on its maritime economy, including information on the primary, secondary and tertiary levels of the fishing industry and its associated net worth.
The nation has also failed to establish a maritime economy production chain and industry database, which could be used for academic study and policy reference. In addition, the government has yet to identify any specific areas of the maritime industry for development.
Taiwan has not even managed to integrate the most important scientific research: The government has not even stated which organization is to be responsible for taking the lead in this area. Furthermore, responsibility for the areas of fisheries conservation and fisheries subsidies is spread across different governmental departments and is not properly integrated.
Taiwan is rich in resources and as such is advantageously placed to develop its maritime industry, yet, most Taiwanese are unfamiliar with the sea and have displayed a total lack of ambition in exploiting the treasures of the ocean.
The establishment of an organization directly responsible for the maritime industry has been delayed repeatedly, and it still is not capable of full and effective integration. For example, the Fisheries Agency and the Fisheries Research Institute are both managed by the Council of Agriculture, while Taiwan’s marine research vessel is managed by the Ministry of Science and Technology. The council established the new Agricultural Technology Research Institute, adding to existing needless redundancy between agencies.
Every time an election comes around, each candidate goes out of his or her way to stress how much importance they place on maritime affairs, even coming up with stirring slogans such as “maritime nation,” or “maritime national rejuvenation,” while making promises to look at the allocation of land rights.
However, experience has shown that this is nothing more than a strategy to win over more votes, targeted at specific groups of the electorate. No specific planning is carried out and consequently, nothing is achieved. This means that, to this day, Taiwan is still unable to call itself a maritime nation.
If those in power do not change focus thoroughly, even the passage of the four maritime bills might not allow Taiwan to recast itself overnight into a maritime nation.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics and a former director of the Yunlin County Department of Agriculture.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with