A Taipei court ruling on Wednesday ordering Nantou County Fire Department officials to pay compensation for the 2011 death of a hiker has stirred outrage. It is the first time that government rescue workers have been found liable in such a case. Most of the criticism is of the blame-the-victim mentality because Chang Po-wei (張博崴) decided to climb Baigushan (白姑大山) on his own after plans to go with a friend fell through. That outrage might be misplaced.
The seven-week search for Chang involved hundreds of people — officials, volunteers and some rescuers hired by the family. While Chang’s family sued the Nantou County police and fire departments, other police units, the National Fire Agency and a Forestry Bureau office, the court exonerated all but the fire department. The county fire department has vowed to appeal, saying the ruling was detrimental to society. However, it is more detrimental not to have the best-equipped and best-trained police, fire and rescue units possible.
The family said precious time was lost because the authorities initially refused to access Chang’s cellphone GPS data due to privacy concerns. Police and fire department teams also restricted their search to mountain trails because their ropes were not long enough to go down into the valleys, even though Chang’s girlfriend said she heard running water during a phone call he made the day after he began his trek, when he said he was lost.
Chang’s body was found by mountain climbers hired by his family — two days after they began the search — who climbed down 600m into a valley tracking water sounds. A medical examiner said Chang died five or six days before he was found. Understandably his family feels he might have been saved. Chang’s case is not the first — and sadly is unlikely to be the last — for which police, fire department and military teams have proven to be ill-equipped or ill-trained.
In June 1995, a fire gutted the top three floors of Taipei’s Grand Hotel, despite a response by hundreds of firefighters, because their extension ladders were not long enough to reach the roof, the water pressure on site was too low and military and police helicopters did not have firefighting apparatus.
In the Pachang Creek (八掌溪) tragedy in July 2000, Chiayi Fire Department personnel had never used key rescue equipment because the instructions were in Japanese, while the military wasted time squabbling over whose responsibility it would be to order helicopters deployed. The four workers trapped by a flash flood clung to each other for more than two hours awaiting rescue that never came.
On Jan. 15, 2013, a Hsinchu County man burned to death because the township’s fire department’s aerial ladder truck was too wide for the lane to his building, its aluminum ladders were not long enough and firefighters did not have an inflatable mattresses so that the man might jump to safety.
And those are just three of the more well-publicized incidents where equipment deficiencies proved crucial. Accidents happen and sometimes rescues fail even when respondents are fully equipped and trained, but we should be asking what could be learned from such incidents and take steps to improve the situation.
The Chang family has been trying to do that. In February 2012, the National Communications Commission passed an amendment to regulations for administration on satellite communication services (衛星通信業務管理規則) to allow telecom carriers to offer satellite communication services on behalf of foreign operators. The amendment was proposed by Chang’s mother so that it would be easier for mountain climbers to use satellite phones — and for rescuers to locate them.
Chang’s death is a reminder to think twice about hiking alone, but authorities should be addressing what can be done to improve Taiwan’s rescue services.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS