A Taipei court ruling on Wednesday ordering Nantou County Fire Department officials to pay compensation for the 2011 death of a hiker has stirred outrage. It is the first time that government rescue workers have been found liable in such a case. Most of the criticism is of the blame-the-victim mentality because Chang Po-wei (張博崴) decided to climb Baigushan (白姑大山) on his own after plans to go with a friend fell through. That outrage might be misplaced.
The seven-week search for Chang involved hundreds of people — officials, volunteers and some rescuers hired by the family. While Chang’s family sued the Nantou County police and fire departments, other police units, the National Fire Agency and a Forestry Bureau office, the court exonerated all but the fire department. The county fire department has vowed to appeal, saying the ruling was detrimental to society. However, it is more detrimental not to have the best-equipped and best-trained police, fire and rescue units possible.
The family said precious time was lost because the authorities initially refused to access Chang’s cellphone GPS data due to privacy concerns. Police and fire department teams also restricted their search to mountain trails because their ropes were not long enough to go down into the valleys, even though Chang’s girlfriend said she heard running water during a phone call he made the day after he began his trek, when he said he was lost.
Chang’s body was found by mountain climbers hired by his family — two days after they began the search — who climbed down 600m into a valley tracking water sounds. A medical examiner said Chang died five or six days before he was found. Understandably his family feels he might have been saved. Chang’s case is not the first — and sadly is unlikely to be the last — for which police, fire department and military teams have proven to be ill-equipped or ill-trained.
In June 1995, a fire gutted the top three floors of Taipei’s Grand Hotel, despite a response by hundreds of firefighters, because their extension ladders were not long enough to reach the roof, the water pressure on site was too low and military and police helicopters did not have firefighting apparatus.
In the Pachang Creek (八掌溪) tragedy in July 2000, Chiayi Fire Department personnel had never used key rescue equipment because the instructions were in Japanese, while the military wasted time squabbling over whose responsibility it would be to order helicopters deployed. The four workers trapped by a flash flood clung to each other for more than two hours awaiting rescue that never came.
On Jan. 15, 2013, a Hsinchu County man burned to death because the township’s fire department’s aerial ladder truck was too wide for the lane to his building, its aluminum ladders were not long enough and firefighters did not have an inflatable mattresses so that the man might jump to safety.
And those are just three of the more well-publicized incidents where equipment deficiencies proved crucial. Accidents happen and sometimes rescues fail even when respondents are fully equipped and trained, but we should be asking what could be learned from such incidents and take steps to improve the situation.
The Chang family has been trying to do that. In February 2012, the National Communications Commission passed an amendment to regulations for administration on satellite communication services (衛星通信業務管理規則) to allow telecom carriers to offer satellite communication services on behalf of foreign operators. The amendment was proposed by Chang’s mother so that it would be easier for mountain climbers to use satellite phones — and for rescuers to locate them.
Chang’s death is a reminder to think twice about hiking alone, but authorities should be addressing what can be done to improve Taiwan’s rescue services.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS