Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.”
His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If the level of enthusiasm of a “deep-blue” figure like him has fallen so much, that speaks volumes of the popularity of these Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators among their constituents.
As an old hand, Jaw must have known how prominent being a leader of the “blue fighters” is. If not even he could be bothered to vote, KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) would not be the only casualty; many more would be dethroned, especially “blue fighters” such as KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯). They might seem like a coherent gang, but they flee when they catch a whiff of a threat.
If KMT legislators like Lo are confident about holding on to their seats, Jaw could have just gone on vacation. In other words, Jaw’s reversal must have been informed by Lo’s uncertainty, and he chose to drop his travel plans as a result. In the event of Lo’s defeat, Jaw’s public statement might save him from becoming the whipping boy and a total bankruptcy of his political power within the blue camp.
When Jaw said he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead,” he must have known that many of them would not vote; they have already booked their flights and would rather follow their schedules. If that was not the case, then who would he be calling on?
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Cayce Pan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS