Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.”
His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If the level of enthusiasm of a “deep-blue” figure like him has fallen so much, that speaks volumes of the popularity of these Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators among their constituents.
As an old hand, Jaw must have known how prominent being a leader of the “blue fighters” is. If not even he could be bothered to vote, KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) would not be the only casualty; many more would be dethroned, especially “blue fighters” such as KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯). They might seem like a coherent gang, but they flee when they catch a whiff of a threat.
If KMT legislators like Lo are confident about holding on to their seats, Jaw could have just gone on vacation. In other words, Jaw’s reversal must have been informed by Lo’s uncertainty, and he chose to drop his travel plans as a result. In the event of Lo’s defeat, Jaw’s public statement might save him from becoming the whipping boy and a total bankruptcy of his political power within the blue camp.
When Jaw said he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead,” he must have known that many of them would not vote; they have already booked their flights and would rather follow their schedules. If that was not the case, then who would he be calling on?
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Cayce Pan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS