Sun, Jul 27, 2025 page8

• EDITORIAL: KMT emboldened, not supported

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8).

  In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls.

  The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired, civic groups and concerned voters took the idea and ran with it, initiating an unprecedented drive that Taiwan should be proud of.

  Each one of yesterday’s 24 recall votes against KMT legislators failed, as did the one against suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), and yet the recall movement can still be held up as a victory for democracy, because of the scale of the mobilization. Victory in defeat, because sometimes the other candidate wins: It is the process that counts.

  The process was driven from the bottom up, and recalls are a necessary democratic mechanism. However, the process itself might have disaffected many voters. It is possible that many would have voted “no” not because they supported the legislator representing their constituency, but because they supported the principle of terms of elected office, and felt uneasy about wresting an elected lawmaker from their seat in a mass recall so soon after last year’s legislative election.

  Another element is that the recall motions were fighting an uphill battle, as they were — by definition — only being held in blue-leaning districts where the KMT had won just 18 months ago.

  If anger over the mass recall contributed to yesterday’s failure, it leaves room for lingering frustration with the KMT’s disruptive, unconstitutional and suspiciously China-friendly actions in the legislature. This resentment could play a role in the next legislative elections, particularly if the KMT-TPP opposition fails to change tack.

  KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) might be elated with yesterday’s results, but he would be unwise to be emboldened by them. He should take note of the groundswell of voter anger at the direction in which he has taken the opposition, but it is doubtful he will.

  This is evident from the KMT and TPP’s decision, on the eve of the recall vote, to reject all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) grand justice nominees for the Constitutional Court — the second time in six months that all nominees have been rejected.

  This blanket rejection, which would hobble the proper functioning of the nation’s constitutional system, is yet another example of the KMT’s willingness to prioritize party interests — possibly even Beijing’s agenda — over the national interest, and another reason voters are so alarmed by the opposition’s behavior.

  It seems that Chu continues to believe his absurd claims that the recall movement was the result of a dictatorial president overseeing an authoritarian government, rather than reflecting the genuine concerns of large segments of the electorate.

  Unfortunately, given yesterday’s results and Chu’s deafness to what the voters are telling him, the future appears to hold more chaos, only exacerbated by calls for retributive recalls against the DPP.

  Ker’s desire for an easy way out of his challenges in the legislature have been dashed. The DPP cannot expect any good news from the seven more recalls, scheduled for Aug. 23, for the same reasons that yesterday’s foundered.

  Chu would likely be emboldened, but it might be time for Lai to take off the gloves and adopt a more proactive approach against the opposition.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Jeers as Real Madrid fall 2-1 to Man City

  • 2

    Taiwanese tourists go viral in video during Japan quake

  • 3

    Taiwan, Poland to codevelop drones

  • 4

    Climber to attempt free solo of 101

  • 5

    YouBike to require insurance for all riders from Jan. 1