When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8).
In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls.
The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired, civic groups and concerned voters took the idea and ran with it, initiating an unprecedented drive that Taiwan should be proud of.
Each one of yesterday’s 24 recall votes against KMT legislators failed, as did the one against suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), and yet the recall movement can still be held up as a victory for democracy, because of the scale of the mobilization. Victory in defeat, because sometimes the other candidate wins: It is the process that counts.
The process was driven from the bottom up, and recalls are a necessary democratic mechanism. However, the process itself might have disaffected many voters. It is possible that many would have voted “no” not because they supported the legislator representing their constituency, but because they supported the principle of terms of elected office, and felt uneasy about wresting an elected lawmaker from their seat in a mass recall so soon after last year’s legislative election.
Another element is that the recall motions were fighting an uphill battle, as they were — by definition — only being held in blue-leaning districts where the KMT had won just 18 months ago.
If anger over the mass recall contributed to yesterday’s failure, it leaves room for lingering frustration with the KMT’s disruptive, unconstitutional and suspiciously China-friendly actions in the legislature. This resentment could play a role in the next legislative elections, particularly if the KMT-TPP opposition fails to change tack.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) might be elated with yesterday’s results, but he would be unwise to be emboldened by them. He should take note of the groundswell of voter anger at the direction in which he has taken the opposition, but it is doubtful he will.
This is evident from the KMT and TPP’s decision, on the eve of the recall vote, to reject all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) grand justice nominees for the Constitutional Court — the second time in six months that all nominees have been rejected.
This blanket rejection, which would hobble the proper functioning of the nation’s constitutional system, is yet another example of the KMT’s willingness to prioritize party interests — possibly even Beijing’s agenda — over the national interest, and another reason voters are so alarmed by the opposition’s behavior.
It seems that Chu continues to believe his absurd claims that the recall movement was the result of a dictatorial president overseeing an authoritarian government, rather than reflecting the genuine concerns of large segments of the electorate.
Unfortunately, given yesterday’s results and Chu’s deafness to what the voters are telling him, the future appears to hold more chaos, only exacerbated by calls for retributive recalls against the DPP.
Ker’s desire for an easy way out of his challenges in the legislature have been dashed. The DPP cannot expect any good news from the seven more recalls, scheduled for Aug. 23, for the same reasons that yesterday’s foundered.
Chu would likely be emboldened, but it might be time for Lai to take off the gloves and adopt a more proactive approach against the opposition.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to
RSS