Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and its alleged local collaborators — specifically KMT lawmakers.
With the nation’s two largest parties mobilizing supporters in competing rallies over the weekend, political tensions have soared, creating a charged pre-election atmosphere. However, voters should maintain a clear perspective and ask themselves a fundamental question: Are the nation’s lawmakers fulfilling their duties with integrity, in accordance with the Constitution and in defense of public interests and civil rights? Avoid emotional appeals and disinformation.
After KMT groups failed to successfully initiate recalls of DPP lawmakers — many of whom are facing lawsuits for alleged petition signature forgery — the KMT has framed the civic recall efforts as a reactionary move by the “sore loser” DPP, aiming to regain legislative control and accusing President William Lai (賴清德) of seeking “dictatorial power.”
However, the origins of the unprecedented mass recall campaign trace to the “Bluebird” protest movement of May last year, which emerged as a response to KMT and Taiwan People’s Party lawmakers’ series of controversial legislative reform bills that were seen as an attempt to weaken Taiwan’s democracy, paralyze Lai’s administration and increase the power of the legislature to paralyze the central government.
Instead of addressing public concerns, the opposition alliance doubled down, refusing to confirm judges to the Constitutional Court, rendering it inoperable, while also reallocating central government budgets to local governments — where the KMT holds more power — and cutting or freezing large portions of this year’s central government budget. The actions were widely criticized as going too far and seriously affecting the nation’s governance, sparking the recall campaigns.
The KMT’s delegation of lawmakers meeting with Chinese officials and supporting controversial China-friendly bills only added fuel to the fire, intensifying fears that the KMT is harming the nation and intends to “sell out” Taiwan to China.
KMT lawmakers have also repeatedly blocked DPP bills from being listed for committee discussion, bypassed committee reviews and public hearings, and hastily passed their own bills — often revealed only minutes before direct voting. The bills, which include additional holidays, increased military salaries and universal cash handouts, were clearly aimed at garnering support amid the recalls, despite their likely unconstitutionality.
However, this very behavior — disregard for democracy and the rule of law — is what has led to the recall campaigns. While the KMT claims to be defending democracy, its understanding appears to be limited to the belief that its majority status grants it the right to make arbitrary decisions and bypass any discussions, checks or balances through constitutional protections.
The recall election is a democratic mechanism that allows citizens to assess and remove “unfit” officials before their term ends. It serves to halt the damage being done and to allow voters to choose a more suitable candidate, whether from any party or no party at all — ultimately, the decision is in the hands of the voters, to be made rationally.
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
There are no obvious connections between the 7-Eleven retail chain in Japan and the Philippines’ national security concerns in the South China Sea. Here is one, one that also takes in Canadian Broadcasting Corp (CBC), the government of Denmark and Taiwanese plastic surgeons on the way. Japan’s 7-Eleven on Friday last week posted on social media an image of uniforms worn by the chain store’s employees in various locations, including Taiwan, the US, Hawaii, Australia, Sweden, Denmark, Cambodia and the Philippines. If this was intended to promote a sense of camaraderie within the 7-Eleven family, it backfired. Taiwan was tagged with the