All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it.
The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at least some of lawmakers. While seven KMT legislators received “yes” recall votes surpassing the required 25 percent threshold, they did not exceed the number of “no” ballots opposing their recall.
Initially driven by dissatisfaction toward the KMT’s and TPP’s abuses of legislative power and neglect of procedure, the recall campaigns were later reinforced by calls to defend Taiwan from China-friendly KMT lawmakers. Nevertheless, they failed to appeal to voters in the 24 targeted constituencies, primarily in urban Taipei, Taoyuan and Taichung, where the DPP lacked prominent leaders.
The TPP, which would have lost its position as the critical “third party” if the KMT lost more than six seats, has tied its future with the KMT. In the two months leading up to the recall election, the parties focused on opposing what they called a one-party dominant system by the DPP, framing the recall as a DPP initiative to deprive voters of their elected lawmakers, as well as the additional national holidays and NT$10,000 cash handout the KMT and TPP pushed through the legislature.
Political parties and candidates often pledge to implement policies that “can be felt” by the voters. However, the outcome of Saturday’s recall election suggests that the normal functioning of the constitutional system, legislative procedures, and details on budgets and bills could be too complicated for or of little interest to most voters. Even the threat of China’s infiltrations in Taiwanese politics feels too distant, compared with voters’ perceived threat of being deprived of their holidays, cash handouts and their choice of elected officials.
Amid shrinking attention spans, recall campaigners had a difficult task reaching out to voters and explaining the reasons for the recall bids. Those voters might instead view the campaigners’ passion as a disturbance to the relative stability of a non-election year. Meanwhile, the message of an imminent threat of Chinese infiltration failed to strike a chord with many voters, as China’s daily military incursions, suppression of Taiwan’s international space and subtle attempts to undermine Taiwanese trust in their democratic system are not “directly felt” by voters in their daily lives. Some might even feel that Chinese entertainment and influencers on TikTok and Xiaohongshu (also known as RedNote in English) or the Labubu craze are more relatable, and that fighting communism and defending Taiwan are just political slogans to solicit votes.
Saturday’s outcome might be disappointing to civic groups, but it is not a total failure, as the process has made some people rethink democracy, and again displayed Taiwan’s thriving democracy to the world through a peaceful election initiated at the grassroots level by people from all walks of life.
However, the DPP-led government must see the outcome as a serious warning that its messaging efforts to raise public awareness of Chinese infiltration must be modified to be “felt” and understood by people and implement more policies that directly improve people’s lives. It also needs to work on new solutions to reconcile with the KMT and TPP, or it is doomed to face stronger resistance in the Legislative Yuan, crippling its governance in the coming days.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS