Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature.
Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a check on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and restore balance to the system. That hope has proven misplaced.
Look what the KMT and the TPP have done with that majority.
Within weeks of the election, KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) led a delegation to China and met with Wang Huning (王滬寧), Beijing’s top official in charge of “united front” work. Wang is not just a policy thinker, he is the chief architect of China’s ideological strategy to weaken Taiwan from within — not through war, but through manipulation, infiltration and political co-opting. That a senior KMT figure would meet him, under the pretext of a “cross-strait exchange,” before the new legislature even got to work, was a flashing red warning.
Since then, the KMT-TPP bloc has wasted no time flexing its power. It has bypassed debate, forced through legislation that curtails oversight, weakened Taiwan’s defense and used its majority not to check the executive, but to disable it. These are not checks and balances. This is sabotage disguised as procedure. Now, they expect the public to either forget or give up.
The recall movement is the public’s answer. It is lawful, it is constitutional and it is the only available tool — short of the next election — to halt this trajectory.
Let us be absolutely clear about what success of the recall means. It means ousting enough KMT legislators to break the pan-blue majority in the legislature. It means stopping this legislative hijacking before it metastasizes into something we can no longer undo. It means setting the stage for by-elections to restore a working majority to the DPP, which is committed to resisting Beijing’s grip.
Some might still say: “But I don’t like the DPP either.”
In normal times, that sentiment would be the basis for healthy political change. However, when “change” comes at the cost of eroding Taiwan’s sovereignty, what we need is not change for its own sake, but improvement within a framework that protects our freedom.
Here is the hard truth: If Taiwan’s political institutions fall under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party’s “united front” strategy, your party preference would no longer matter. There would be no meaningful elections left to debate.
The recall vote is not about hatred. It is not just about punishing misconduct or replacing underperforming lawmakers. It is about stopping — immediately — those who have chosen to prioritize ties with Beijing over accountability to the people who elected them. It is about recognizing that if we do not act now, we might not get another chance before 2028. By then, the damage could be irreversible.
We are voting to defend the only system that still allows us to punish, question and replace those in power. We are voting to protect the democracy that many once doubted could even survive in Taiwan, and we are doing it not with protest signs, but with ballots.
This is the line, and it will not draw itself.
Vote for the recalls. Tell your friends. Remind your neighbors. Bring your family. If you have ever cared about Taiwan’s freedom, now is the time to show it.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS