Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature.
Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a check on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and restore balance to the system. That hope has proven misplaced.
Look what the KMT and the TPP have done with that majority.
Within weeks of the election, KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) led a delegation to China and met with Wang Huning (王滬寧), Beijing’s top official in charge of “united front” work. Wang is not just a policy thinker, he is the chief architect of China’s ideological strategy to weaken Taiwan from within — not through war, but through manipulation, infiltration and political co-opting. That a senior KMT figure would meet him, under the pretext of a “cross-strait exchange,” before the new legislature even got to work, was a flashing red warning.
Since then, the KMT-TPP bloc has wasted no time flexing its power. It has bypassed debate, forced through legislation that curtails oversight, weakened Taiwan’s defense and used its majority not to check the executive, but to disable it. These are not checks and balances. This is sabotage disguised as procedure. Now, they expect the public to either forget or give up.
The recall movement is the public’s answer. It is lawful, it is constitutional and it is the only available tool — short of the next election — to halt this trajectory.
Let us be absolutely clear about what success of the recall means. It means ousting enough KMT legislators to break the pan-blue majority in the legislature. It means stopping this legislative hijacking before it metastasizes into something we can no longer undo. It means setting the stage for by-elections to restore a working majority to the DPP, which is committed to resisting Beijing’s grip.
Some might still say: “But I don’t like the DPP either.”
In normal times, that sentiment would be the basis for healthy political change. However, when “change” comes at the cost of eroding Taiwan’s sovereignty, what we need is not change for its own sake, but improvement within a framework that protects our freedom.
Here is the hard truth: If Taiwan’s political institutions fall under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party’s “united front” strategy, your party preference would no longer matter. There would be no meaningful elections left to debate.
The recall vote is not about hatred. It is not just about punishing misconduct or replacing underperforming lawmakers. It is about stopping — immediately — those who have chosen to prioritize ties with Beijing over accountability to the people who elected them. It is about recognizing that if we do not act now, we might not get another chance before 2028. By then, the damage could be irreversible.
We are voting to defend the only system that still allows us to punish, question and replace those in power. We are voting to protect the democracy that many once doubted could even survive in Taiwan, and we are doing it not with protest signs, but with ballots.
This is the line, and it will not draw itself.
Vote for the recalls. Tell your friends. Remind your neighbors. Bring your family. If you have ever cared about Taiwan’s freedom, now is the time to show it.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS